Simarino
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2009
- 3,686
- 3,495
So I watched the highlights of this game. I see a bad rebound by Niemi which leads to the fifth goal, but not anything else egregious outside of that. The Tampa goals seemed to mostly be on very well executed plays (they score a ton of goals as it is). Didn’t look like Vasilevsky was that great either.
Do you guys put this more on Niemi just because he wasn’t making huge saves against a strong offense or did you think more goals than I thought were really bad? To me, they just all look like they came on grade A chances.
Just looking for some honest takes (which as we all know are way more possible the day AFTER a loss).
The Stralman’s goal wasnt a good one, a super juicy rebound on a weak shot from the point on the 5th goal, boxing the puck all night, shots we’re going thru him but just missed the net on a few occasions. He’s got a 4.25 GAA and under .870 save%, not even close to be in the nhl standards.