Based on what? Plus minus? One of the least useful and most derided stats around?
Record wise Petan is better scorer on a worse team.
Th Only Reason he is in the AHL, especially now that we are in tank mode, is because we keep icing a useless Burmistrov.
Just a question, and not necessarily directed towards you: why does this seem to be the prevailing wisdom with Petan, and not with Copp?
I don't want to turn this into a Copp thread, but it seems like most are perfectly happy that he's sticking with the Jets. I'm not quite sure how he's demonstrated any more pro-readiness than Petan.
Don't think he was ever off track. He wasn't put in any kind of position to succeed with the Jets. Basically thrown into the deep end and given a tennis ball and rubber ducky as flotation devices.
His play away from the puck will still need some work, but there's never been any question in my mind that his offensive ceiling is high.
I think this is a great question, and to some extent philosophical. Personally, I would never plug a rookie pro into the 4th line as anything but an injury replacement. Playing that role gives that player no opportunity to develop at the pro level, particularly offensive skill. There's the rare case of a guy who is both a tremendous offensive player already, but an extreme liability 5 on 5 who can play a significant role on the PP. That's about the only scenario where I'd like to see a rookie pro on the 4th line.
Priority should be on getting guys ice time against reasonable competition at a level where they can grow while having success.
I think this is a great question, and to some extent philosophical. Personally, I would never plug a rookie pro into the 4th line as anything but an injury replacement. Playing that role gives that player no opportunity to develop at the pro level, particularly offensive skill. There's the rare case of a guy who is both a tremendous offensive player already, but an extreme liability 5 on 5 who can play a significant role on the PP. That's about the only scenario where I'd like to see a rookie pro on the 4th line.
Priority should be on getting guys ice time against reasonable competition at a level where they can grow while having success.
I don't know how to post Hero/Warrior charts, but he suppressed shots/goals at a top 6 rate most of his career.
Don't think he was ever off track. He wasn't put in any kind of position to succeed with the Jets. Basically thrown into the deep end and given a tennis ball and rubber ducky as flotation devices.
His play away from the puck will still need some work, but there's never been any question in my mind that his offensive ceiling is high.
I don't know how to post Hero/Warrior charts, but he suppressed shots/goals at a top 6 rate most of his career.
I think this is a great question, and to some extent philosophical. Personally, I would never plug a rookie pro into the 4th line as anything but an injury replacement. Playing that role gives that player no opportunity to develop at the pro level, particularly offensive skill. There's the rare case of a guy who is both a tremendous offensive player already, but an extreme liability 5 on 5 who can play a significant role on the PP. That's about the only scenario where I'd like to see a rookie pro on the 4th line.
Priority should be on getting guys ice time against reasonable competition at a level where they can grow while having success.
It seems to me that the only thing Petan needs is to learn how to gain possession. Once he has the puck with a reasonable amount of space, its smooth sailing. Problem is, that he can't gain possession on his own and 4th line plugs can't get the puck to him.
I don't know how to post Hero/Warrior charts, but he suppressed shots/goals at a top 6 rate most of his career.
Exactly. Said it before and I'll say it again, this guy is going to be our top playmaker and is going to make some unbelievable plays one day if he gets a chance.
I agree with this. It feels like Petan is almost an afterthought as far as mgmt goes. Hope they don't give up on him and he goes on to become the next Paul Kariya.
I feel like sooner or later there's going to be a philosophical shift among NHL teams with respect to the fourth line being used as a refuge for plugs like Thorburn and big, young players with limited ceilings like Copp. NHL teams need to maximize the careers and contributions of players under 27, it's becoming an almost inarguable rule of success in the modern NHL.
I think it's happening to some extent: look at Tampa Bay, who has used skill players like Namestnikov, Drouin, Kucherov, and Marchessault in a fourth line role at various points.
There always is the question of development on an NHL fourth line versus the AHL, but I feel like NHL organizations could very well start thinking outside the box with their fourth lines, using them as a place for young and offensively talented players to learn the defensive side of the game as opposed to the traditional 7 min/game "checking line" where face punchers and marginal veterans reside.
I agree with this. It feels like Petan is almost an afterthought as far as mgmt goes. Hope they don't give up on him and he goes on to become the next Paul Kariya.
The best thing Petan could do to up his chances for next year is to follow the Scheiflie road and attend the Gary Roberts School of man maker IMO. There is obviously nothing wrong with the offensive part of his game, he just needs to bulk up.
I know that asome of you will say that Johnny hockey didn't have to bulk up but Petan didn't rack up 80 points in a league amongst men either though.
It's awesome that Petan is starting to come on in the AHL. IMO he should have been down there after the first couple of games with the Jets. You could see he really struggled in his own end, in the corners and along the boards.
His passing and vision are his best traits and once he learns how to use those against the board battlers he will be a full time NHLer but I feel like he will need at least another season with the Moose before he gets a call up. The fact that he was the worst driver of play on the team, worse than even Thorburn and Burmi, is all the evidence I need.
I want this kid to succeed and be a good playmaker at the NHL level and I think over ripening him might be the best way to achieve that end goal.