USMC607
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2013
- 4,143
- 2,291
I am hearing Pettersson and Buffalo's 4th for McQuaid.
I will flip my f***ing desk....
They better not f***ing dare.
I am hearing Pettersson and Buffalo's 4th for McQuaid.
There is one thing I learned in life.... focus on the things you can control. JR going savage psycho old man is something I cannot control. I love hockey. I love the Pens. But if he wants to go full psycho, I'll spend my time wisely and less invested.
Off to the gym I go. @KIRK - i expect you to text me details of how we got Lucic and McQuaid soon. @DegenX - i expect you to ban 5 people instantly.
We have a few guys with some promise now, sure, but we aren't well stocked. And we're in that stage where we need to balance out 'win now' with not sucking a couple years down the road. I'd also add we don't really know what we have if we never play them, but I'm sure someone will point out that all coaches love vets and 'their guys'.Meh we thought it was bare before, too, and out popped Sheary/Guentzel/Rust/Dumo/etc.
Well a couple things to negate what you are saying.
1) They had to battle through crazy amount of injuries. So at times they didn't have a say.
2) Cully played almost the full game (lol) against Nashville and Rowney sat a lot. Rowney was only brought in when Ottawa started clogging everything up.
3) How did they play? They transitioned with speed. It was impressive. They all had a sense of urgency for speed on the backcheck and it drove teams NUTS. And then they transitioned back to offense with speed.
Sure.. it wasn't as aggressive as 2016 but that was due to a lot of injuries. They still played plenty fast. Faster than this current team is playing by a country mile.
Unless I'm remembering wrong, that team got absolutely caved in a majority of the playoffs, and only won because of excellent goaltending and opportunistic scoring. That team didn't play fast from what I remember, they were opportunistic and lucky.
That's a tank move, if we are looking to tank we do that.I am hearing Pettersson and Buffalo's 4th for McQuaid.
If Jets wanna change some things around in the off season and we wanna be a team to not mess with, what about a big time trade for Trouba and Big Buf? What would the cost be?
Unless I'm remembering wrong, that team got absolutely caved in a majority of the playoffs, and only won because of excellent goaltending and opportunistic scoring. That team didn't play fast from what I remember, they were opportunistic and lucky.
Unless I'm remembering wrong, that team got absolutely caved in a majority of the playoffs, and only won because of excellent goaltending and opportunistic scoring. That team didn't play fast from what I remember, they were opportunistic and lucky.
I'm sorry but anyone arguing that this team's prospect pool is anything other than extremely shallow are deluding themselves. I appreciate that a few guys have sorta come outta nowhere in the recent past. Particularly Guentzel. But that's not at all common when you consider where this team has been drafting. Or more accurately not drafting.
They got caved pretty badly at times and they certainly were opportunistic. That said, I think they played slower than 2016 but definitely a lot faster than this team.
My comment was more that I don't see it as a huge problem, not that it wasn't shallow. It's the same stance I've had for years, the Penguins have all of their top guys cost controlled, so I don't see it as being a problem that they lack top end talent in their prospect pool.
I think the issue isnt foot speed but the ability to be crisp enough to utilize the speed the have and the aggression they want.
I think the biggest indictment on JR right now is that we have Malkin, Crosby, and Kessel, and we're a one line team. How is that possible?
They got caved pretty badly at times and they certainly were opportunistic. That said, I think they played slower than 2016 but definitely a lot faster than this team.
I'm not sure a shallow prospect pool absent some heavy hitters qualifies as anything but a problem (unless you meant something else).
Calling us a one line team is charitable.
Is the Crosby line out there tilting the ice against legit playoff teams (or dominating anyone aside from the worst)?
I think the biggest indictment on JR right now is that we have Malkin, Crosby, and Kessel, and we're a one line team. How is that possible?
Calling us a one line team is charitable.
Is the Crosby line out there tilting the ice against legit playoff teams (or dominating anyone aside from the worst)?
I think the biggest indictment on JR right now is that we have Malkin, Crosby, and Kessel, and we're a one line team. How is that possible?
From what I recall our possession metrics were a mixed bag against Columbus, terrible against Washington (except for game 7, where we dominated), good against Ottawa, and terrible against Nashville for the first 4 before we turned the tables on them in games 5 and 6 which we mostly dominated.