Doctor No
Registered User
The skewness in minutes played is largely a reflection that there are 17 NHL teams with a positive power rating, and only 13 with a negative power rating (but there are some doozies among those 13).
Edit: Oh, and are these strength metrics as of current, or as of the time the game was played?
Is there a reason Hammond isn't on the list for Ottawa yet? Or has the threshold changed from 10 games now?
Numbers of Kay Whitmore and Guy Hebert in 92-93 are quite interesting. Whitmore was backup with extremely easy schedule, Hebert one with a very hard schedule. Did that easy schedule make Whitmore look that much better than he actually was? He was Whalers reject prior to that season and he faded away only few season after that.
I haven't dug into it too much, but is Scott Darling's schedule (relative to Antti Raanta) an indication of relative trust (and supported by the promotion), or random noise?
It seem that neither one haven´t got much games when Crawford is healthy, but everything seem to indicate that Darling is more trusted. I was expecting that they would have given Darling more games after his latest callup. Watched few games from Raanta early in the season and even when the numbers weren´t bad I think he could have used his chance better. Interesting situation all in all.
How much work would it be to do an analysis on the Canucks goaltending when Schneider and Luongo were both on the team.
Perhaps by season? If it takes too long don't worry about it, but it's been a topic of discussion various times even this season on the Canucks board. Would love to see if the eye matches the stats.
Year ONe: Schneider was sheltered
Year 2: a bit stronger
Year 3: starter in a shortened season (only playing the west probably skews the analysis).