No. We were in the stanley cup final last year and just won the presidents trophy. We have pretty much no kids that are ready and no teams have cap space for our bigger contracts.
You highlight some important issues. But both Relatively successful years you mentioned, they were not good enough.
So to win it all, if that’s the goal, they need to be better than they were both of those years, right? (Unless we’re hoping to get in and have things break the right way come playoff time - - like TB and the Caps getting knocked out before we have to face them????)
Now, a year older Krejci, a year older and more banged up Bergeron, a lost Dman who was key to the PP... these facts don’t contribute to being BETTER than the last two years.
What they’d need to add would seem to be fairly substantial to me. Maybe a Hall (ooops, gone to see the falls for a year), a Pietro (rats, he’s getting fat in Vegas).... is Dadanov or Toffoli (now headed time Montreal) or a couple guys like that going to be enough?
I can see the merit in what the poster you responded to was saying, but agree with some of your sentiment on the challenges associated with a rebuild at this time. Retaining this core the past two years looks like it was the right move, especially the year of the run to the finals.
Doing so now may be less a matter of thinking the squad is a true contender and more driven by an inherent difficulty getting reasonable returns for members of the current roster.
Seems the bruins are stuck in the middle here, and despite the acknowledgement that changes are needed, no clear path forward, driving a waning confidence with many here with regard to getting significantly better this year OR setting the stage for the next several years.