No cause we got a better GM
And for a second rounder? If we got offered a second just a take him I'd think long about itHextalls final nail in the coffin. Not even 50%, just straight up 5M per. I didn't mind Hextall but for that trade I am glad he was terminated.
I hope that Kalan Lind becomes elite so we can talk about how we traded Kalan Lind for Granlund.And for a second rounder? If we got offered a second just a take him I'd think long about it
edit: Nm, someone deleted their tweet
If you're simply referring to another season of Granlund, yeah that's possible. May be unwise to throw good money after bad. Really just depends. I'm sure the right team could squeeze some juice out of him but that cap hit is a killer. I would just buy him out.I sure hope so. Much as I complain sometimes I'm not going to take keeping Granlund as some sort of definitive waving of the white flag. But it would sure be disappointing.
If you're simply referring to another season of Granlund, yeah that's possible. May be unwise to throw good money after bad. Really just depends. I'm sure the right team could squeeze some juice out of him but that cap hit is a killer. I would just buy him out.
I thought you were imagining a similar trade on the horizon, which I pray does not occur.
Would be nice if we signed one or two of the new FAs who are being mentioned in the "best undrafted" conversations that are taking place now. But with Sully's rep with young players, I'm not holding my breath.
Still, Dubas can play the "There's a new sheriff in town" card PLUS the "we have a sh***y prospects pool" to try to convince them that there is real opportunity in this organization.
How cool would it be if it turned out to be true, though? Sullivan and Dubas working in tandem, focused, coherent ideas.The new narrative is that Sullivan finally has a GM that communicates with him so now he can get serious.
Which definitely doesn't sound like an excuse after rolling through two GMs and a multitude of rosters that he for sure had zero input on.
How cool would it be if it turned out to be true, though? Sullivan and Dubas working in tandem, focused, coherent ideas.
I mean, it's entirely bullshit and Sullivan is an egomaniac, but Hextall was also a total moron so there's like the tiniest bit of light peeking through the crack in the door here.
I don't follow draft prospects almost at all any longer. It sort of leaves me longing for draft eligible player age to be 20 instead of 18. Take some of the long game out of this process and make it easier to follow and a shorter time frame for them to be NHLers.
There's still a good coach in there somewhere. So that would indeed be awesome.
This might come off as ironic, but I don't see that as cataclysmic as the majority here.What a sickening trade Granlund was. Just pure sabotage.
Pretty much did, missed the playoffs.Looking through the prospect threads, I feel like if you'd told people in 2021 that the Pens would pick Yager and Jarventie in 2023, they'd assume the Pens had absolutely cratered.
This might come off as ironic, but I don't see that as cataclysmic as the majority here.
I think Sullivan and the Penguins have a pretty decent reputation for bringing in young players, especially unsigned/undrafted UFAs. ZAR, DOC, Sheary, Marino to an extent even though he was a 6th...Would be nice if we signed one or two of the new FAs who are being mentioned in the "best undrafted" conversations that are taking place now. But with Sully's rep with young players, I'm not holding my breath.
Still, Dubas can play the "There's a new sheriff in town" card PLUS the "we have a sh***y prospects pool" to try to convince them that there is real opportunity in this organization.
I guess I don't see Granlund being here or not as the difference between this team winning or losing. I just don't see us as competitive against the better teams in the league. Not thrilled about us giving up a 2hd rounder however.Why not?