I hate to defend them but records in this league Are deceiving. They are only 2-7 because they missed their QB and top WR. They were in just about every game without Tony. I'm guessing it goes different with him. Carolina may be 9-0 but there's like one good win on that resume. The NFL is a lot about scheduling. I'll buy ne because well they were here last year and what not. I'll buy Cincinnati...they've been consistently good for a few years now. Though I don't trust Dalton in the playoffs. I have a really hard time based off of last year and before that, that the panthers are really this good. It makes about zero sense. Its not like outside of Norman their roster got better this off season. You could argue it actually got worse.
You are so salty I feel my inner Gandhi raging within.
Did you know that the Arizona Cardinals currently have
zero wins against teams with a winning record?
Did you know that the Minnesota Vikings currently have
zero wins against teams with a winning record?
Did you know that the Green Bay Packers currently have
zero wins against teams with a winning record?
Did you know that the Atlanta Falcons currently have
zero wins against teams with a winning record?
Your argument is terrible in a vacuum. It's flat out incorrect, and also circular. The Panthers play teams with losing records. Why do they have losing records? Because they play good teams (
like the Panthers). Then you try to take it and show that, because the Panthers have
one win against a "good" team, they are not a "threat" to the Cowboys.
(BTW, you cite the Cowboys missing Dez Bryant as a reason, conveniently forgetting that the Panthers are without their #1 Wide Receiver for the rest of the year. M'kay)
The Panthers have an elite run offense and an elite pass defense. They are a "threat" to any team in this League. If you want to say they are not a "threat" to a team with all of 2 wins this season, that's fine, but please bring an argument so that you demonstrate you know what you are talking about.