Taxman said:Lundqvist has a much more impressive resume than Lehtonen?
Lehtonen's resume seriously craps all over Lundqvist's. I have no idea where you got the idea that Lundqvist has anywhere near the resume Lehtonen has.
BTW, Lehtonen is in the AHL playoffs again right now and again is proving himself to be a ****ing big time big game goalie. He has been the best goalie of the entire AHL playoff tournament so far.
Steadfast said:why then did the Rangers choose Montoya?
Tuomo#1 said:This is kind of strange, Lehtonen has dominated the SM-Liiga, World Juniors, the AHL and hasnt lost in the NHL.
DoobieDoobieDo said:Jesus! The Rangers homerism is really coming out. Remember Blackburn?
Cam Ward is arguably the 2nd best goaltending prospect out there. Say all you want about Toivonen/Miller/Lunqvist, Ward is simply sensational and vastly underrated. The guy dominates everywhere he plays, and had a sensational season in the AHL, his first, with better stats than Lehtonen and Toivonen (except for wins). Kari's and Hannu's stats in their first seasons have nothing on Ward. IMO the most important stat for a keeper is save %, and Ward is #1 in the AHL. He is also currently leading his team in the playoffs. Not bad for a first year, even though he has Krahn as #2, a good one himself. As for Lunqvist, people might disagree, but the N.A. rink and game type is a big difference, because if not Huselius would lead the NHL in scoring like he did the SEL b4 getting canned. Lunqvist is behind Lehtonen/Ward/Toivonen/Miller right now, and maybe a couple more because we can't really judge him. About NHL players in SEL, a guy like Joe making 6M in NHL comes over to play for 0.5, I don't think he rought his 100% over with him. In the AHL, toothless warriors whack away at the puck in front of the net, not so much seen in the SEL, to earn a chance at the NHL, while SEL players know they are at the top in the country, and go Jagr most of the time. The same can be roughly applied to the WC, where the game is just different because of the size of the ice. Getting used to N.A. play is much more difficult than most think. Guys full of skill tank in the NHL (besides the Kovalchuks), but guys playing N.A. hockey such as Tootoo make the team and belong..BobMarleyNYR said:I think, however, it's a moot point. I'll give it to Lehtonen on sheer skill, but who knows which one will turn out better. At the end of the day, Lehtonen is better right now, IMO. But the people doubting Lundqvist are not very smart hockey fans. He might be top 3 in all NHL goalie prospects.
Til the End of Time said:Something I was wondering as well.
Reveille! said:Yeah, I remember how he had an absolute freak injury.
What in the world does that have to do with it? Way to throw out some stupid left field **** into an otherwise interesting read.
I'm a Rangers fan, but I'd take Lehtonen 2 times outta 3 right now. I can't take Lundqvist over him till he's on NA ice.
Lundqvist could never come over to the US.
Rancid said:Well i'm gonna close it and declare the obvious the winner
Lundqvist
Levitate said:it's extremely likely he'll be over next year. he wants to come over, he wants to play in the NHL, he's willing to play in the AHL first so that's not an issue, and the rangers really want him over. he's not under contract at the moment...basically the ONLY thing keeping him from coming over at the moment is the lack of a CBA.
as for the whole debate, honestly i think lehtonen is the better goalie prospect...but jesus people he's not god, calm down a little about him.
DoobieDoobieDo said:Sucks to be Montoya doesn't it? Or LeBarabara...or whatever his name is...
PanthersRule said:Lehtonen>>>Lundqvist. Lehtonen is THE PREMIER goaltending prospect in the world right now. Lundqvist may turn out to be an excellent goalie, but there is no way can be touted as better than Lehtonen or a better goalie in the NHL at this point.