I can definitely see Abby getting good offers from other options, but I think Shane will be here longer.Abby and Shane will be next, mark it.
I can definitely see Abby getting good offers from other options, but I think Shane will be here longer.Abby and Shane will be next, mark it.
Kinda fits in with the hire young and cheap philosophy that I've heard.
I don’t think this has anything to do with TDA and more to do with how we do business in general under TD.
what made you decide to leave the bulls? if you don't mind me asking, anyway.
i wouldn't just ignore the dude having a kid two weeks ago, though. i actually took a pay cut when my son was a baby to take a job closer to home. all it did was cut 1.5 hours of driving each day (from 2 hours to about 25 minutes) out of my schedule but it was totally worth it. (and, yeah, the gas savings took care of most of the cut.) i can see him wanting a 9 to 5 instead of the crazy (but absolutely fun) schedule with the canes.
I miss the days where Canes fans here mocked the "Dundon so cheap" narrative instead of perpetuating it.
Willing to spend on the ice is all that really matters in the NHL. The players and coaches are who truly determine the success of the franchise. Win and the fans will come no matter who the announcers are or any other thing.I miss the days when we thought his cheapness wasn't relevant.
He is not cheap on the ice. He is damned cheap everywhere else, and we have mountains of evidence now.
Willing to spend on the ice is all that really matters in the NHL. The players and coaches are who truly determine the success of the franchise. Win and the fans will come no matter who the announcers are or any other thing.
That just might be a disconnect between "your" evaluation of what makes good players that are worth paying and what they think makes good players that are worth paying. I mean, sure thing on the cap number if they end up that far below when the season is done, but that's far from being known.Yeah the 'at least Dundon is willing to spend for the team on the ice' rings a little hollow right now given that we are currently about $15m under the cap and have let multiple fan favorites go because of money.
Hard to thump your chests about being willing to "pay for good players" while at the same time kicking good players away because they're not willing to sign your lowball offers.
I'm absolutely willing to give it to the beginning of the season, but after the last week and a half, I'm not really in a spot to staunchly defend Dundon as not being a cheap-ass after the moves we have already made.That just might be a disconnect between "your" evaluation of what makes good players that are worth paying and what they think makes good players that are worth paying. I mean, sure thing on the cap number if they end up that far below when the season is done, but that's far from being known.
Changing does not necessarily equal destroying. I never even heard of this Chase guy until he resigned the other day. I know of Mike Smith, but he’s web/media guy.Disagree, you need to maintain a connection with your community. He is destroying everything we have a connection to in the organization. Including fan favorite players.
The second he stops winning it all comes tumbling down harder than ever before.
I don't care if you or anyone dies on that hill. I honestly don't even care if we're cheap if it works. I do think in the long run, you have to spend to the cap more often than not, and we mostly have. That's the only extent I care about how cheap we are is you're likely not going to be able to moneyball it every season to great success.I'm absolutely willing to give it to the beginning of the season, but after the last week and a half, I'm not really in a spot to staunchly defend Dundon as not being a cheap-ass after the moves we have already made.
Even the analytics experts who cover hockey (like Dom L with The Athletic) who have praised us over the years for our moves are scratching their heads right now over what we're doing, themselves coming to the conclusion that our moves this year have been made to make the roster cheaper. If we're doing this to go big game hunting and actually get someone like Eichel, great. But the fact of the matter is, right now we have a cheaper roster who just lost the best free agent in the league because we weren't willing to pay him what another team did at a cost that we could literally fit under our cap right now even with a Svech extension. And the rumors from reputable sources are that our offers to both him and our Calder Finalist goalie, a position of historical weakness for us, were insultingly low.
Yeah, right now I'm not gonna die on the 'Dundon isn't actually cheap' hill when there is a growing mound of evidence contrary to it.
That's the theory.Willing to spend on the ice is all that really matters in the NHL. The players and coaches are who truly determine the success of the franchise. Win and the fans will come no matter who the announcers are or any other thing.
The second he stops winning it all comes tumbling down harder than ever before.
I think I’m signing off until the season (or roster move). Last week has been nothing but rehashing the exact same point on here
I'll say again that there's still plenty of time between now and game 1. But if the lineup we have now is the one that takes the ice in that game I will be disappointed