GoldiFox
Registered User
- Apr 21, 2014
- 13,287
- 32,030
Depends how you define rebound.
It’s statistically improbable that Darling’s numbers are worse this year than last year, simply because they can’t get much worse as long as Darling is in pads and conscious.
Technically correct - the best kind.
It happens every year to at least one goalie.
Even if it was 2-3 goalies, that still doesn't mean that "one of Darling or Mrazek should rebound". That would mean that "each one of Darling and Mrazek has a 1/31 chance of rebounding", which is a lot lower probability than the idea that it is likely that one of our two will be the one in the league to rebound.
The rebound I'm talking here is a functional rebound which would provide the Canes with a viable starter. Not Darling improving from 13-21-7 (0.888 sv%) to 14-20-7 (0.889 sv%).