Ziggy Stardust
Master Debater
Which is why your analysis of the kings situation and what happened before it is invalid. It's maturity, and maturity coincides with leadership. I never said that Richards never helped the kings. He probably helped the team develop better leadership. But the same could be said with Greene, Stoll, Willie. They are leaders as well.
But what you're not understanding is that Richards is not needed any more. What is needed now is goal scoring, Richards leaving doesn't leave a hole in leadership. We have a lot of leaders now, we don't need him. We need goal scoring.
I can't believe I'm reading this garbage. Did you just start watching hockey when the Kings won the Cup? Seriously, how can anyone who calls themselves a hockey fan say that a guy like Richards is not needed? Unbelievable. Do you remember how crappy this team was and the options they had as #2 centers before Richards' arrival? I'm guessing not judging by the drivel you are posting.
Yes, they do need goal scoring, but at the cost of Mike Richards? Tell me, how many scoring wingers do the Kings have after Carter? Williams? Then who? Brown is a glorified grinder who can chip in occasionally (sadly) and the rest of the wingers on the team are all grinders.
If you've paid any attention at all this season you wouldn't write such crap about Mike Richards. Most nights he's been the best player on the team and he acts more like a leader on the ice than any other player wearing a letter on their sweater.