Problem with this is that it assumes Lou would bend to the will of one of his players. Which I cannot see happening. Especially if we look at some of the firings which came when Patty was not an elder statesmen. Do we think a 22 yr old Patty got Lemaire fired, or a 24 yr old Patty had much to do with Ftorek getting fired? 26 yrs old with Robinson? Lou is going to let that happen?
Not to mention Schoenfield, Cunnif, McVie, and Brooks who were all pre Patty.
Again, it's Lou, it was lou before Patty and it's Lou since Patty.
On the first part, about bending to the players, it's possible that in at least 1-2 cases it was coincidence that they felt the same way. Or perhaps it's just Patty's personality to be more vocal than his teammates. I said in one of my first posts or two about this that I am being a bit revisionist and I am aware of that... But the point stands in hindsight though.
As for the other coaches... Some of them were really just bad here (Brooks) and others had other issues. For what its worth, it's worth noting that McVie's second stint there was a retread as a stopgap when Cunniff was fired. And if we're playing this game, Ftorek got himself fired after he threw that bench.
I have heard things about Parise, which contradict what the perception by the fanbase is.
I'd have to agree with this too, but less so considering his tenure here isn't long enough to really know for sure.
I don't have anything to cite, but I seem to remember hearing that Elias has never really gotten along with many of the coaches.
This is the Devils, there is never anything to cite...
He was pretty vocal about Ilya's tenure during and after. It wasn't cliche either. You want in a player, however I guess we are not use to such things because of a hyper lack of (overall) media coverage of the devils.
Before, during, after... It adds up, no?