77bestever*
Guest
and how has Tallon built the core in Florida??? Those useless picks
Far different scenario. They were building from scratch. We are working around a cup winning nucleus. They are Florida, we are Boston. big difference.
and how has Tallon built the core in Florida??? Those useless picks
When you are close you go for it. That's sports in 2016. I guess when the Kings won the cup from the last playoff spot two years ago, according to you they should have maybe re tooled. I am guessing they made the right choice. Again, we are a large market team that has the highest ticket or one of in all the land. That demands you go for it. We are not Edmonton.
I like Sweeney but when folk are asking for most of his roster fillers to be moved first year as GM that's a little scary. Perhaps a very good thing Gretzky is our head scouting dude.
Far different scenario. They were building from scratch. We are working around a cup winning nucleus. They are Florida, we are Boston. big difference.
Far different scenario. They were building from scratch. We are working around a cup winning nucleus. They are Florida, we are Boston. big difference.
How many players you think the Bruins should get to make them contenders? They aren't right now.Far different scenario. They were building from scratch. We are working around a cup winning nucleus. They are Florida, we are Boston. big difference.
I love how everybody grasps at the Kings winning it a few years ago. It happened this 1 time so it can happen to us! No. It won't. You'll be complaining next season if we trade for these pieces, lose in the 1st round, and then suck again.
How many players you think the Bruins should get to make them contenders? They aren't right now.
3-Top six winger, top 2 dman and a 3-4 dman. Then I say we can win it all.
For example, Ladd, Yandle, Polak. I believe that puts us with Washington come playoff time. Assuming Rask can match Holtby.
3-Top six winger, top 2 dman and a 3-4 dman. Then I say we can win it all.
For example, Ladd, Yandle, Polak. I believe that puts us with Washington come playoff time. Assuming Rask can match Holtby.
.....that should be easy.
3-Top six winger, top 2 dman and a 3-4 dman. Then I say we can win it all.
For example, Ladd, Yandle, Polak. I believe that puts us with Washington come playoff time. Assuming Rask can match Holtby.
I might be able to get on board with this, but if we are trading away top prospects like Subban, Koko etc and SJ's 1st rd pick as part of packages to get players here, then I want someone else over Ladd and Yandle. I am ok with a guy like Polak or Cowen as the depth #4 Dman, but for that #1-2 D I want Shattenkirk/Trouba/Pietrangelo as I don't think much of Yandle. As for the top line winger I would much rather go after Boedker than Ladd. The only way I would also target Ladd is if we had to deal say Krejci or Spooner in a deal for the 1-2 Dman.
And I can get on board with what your saying as well. Time for Sweeney and Neely to step up and put there mouths where the fans money is.
3-Top six winger, top 2 dman and a 3-4 dman. Then I say we can win it all.
For example, Ladd, Yandle, Polak. I believe that puts us with Washington come playoff time. Assuming Rask can match Holtby.
our initial conversation stemmed from you stating picks being "useless", I rebutted that picks are incredibly important, Tallon inherited some talent when he arrived in Florida, but has both drafted and scouted very well much as he did building the Hawks
Sweeney inherited a mess of expensive problems in Boston, Tallon arrived with almost a clean slate to work with
Still waiting for your response to the post you made in #32 that picks are useless?
You corrected me on the Teravainen (sp) deal. Bad on me. However, that's one example of a draft pick making a difference for two teams that have 5 cups in the last six years.
And I am still waiting for your response to M Jones. C Miller and a number 1 for Looch. Seems to me LA did just what I want done now which you fail to acknowledge. Cups are not won with draft picks. They are won with grizzled veterans in their primes for the most part.
Besides, How many picks do we need ? We have the 3 kids from last season. Heinan, Ko Ko, Vetrano, JFK, Subban, and a few more with NHL potential. Then 4 picks this year in the first two rounds. I mean cmon, I think we can spare a few kids in order to satisfy the fan base paying one of the highest prices in the league for everything from a ticket to a beer. I mean, If we are not going to go for it...(And I say they do), Then lets trade Krejci and Bergie and Chara and Marchand. Why have them ? I don't think they deserve to lose the next five years on average teams.
And why cant it be done ? Chances are all three are traded.
How many players you think the Bruins should get to make them contenders? They aren't right now.
The great thing about sports is they hold a new tournament for the title every year.
Sometimes the best way to win one is to realize this year isnt going to be your year, so focus on the next one.
They could do it in as little as two moves. First line, elite scoring forward, and a number one defenseman. Problem is, both of those holes are really difficult to fill.
More realistically, they'll do it in 5. 4 3rd line forwards, and a number 7 d man...
That seems to be obvious to most reasonable people here. Well, except for Cam and Donnie and their "higher expectations". Like I tell my boss all the time, you can expect all you want, but what's going to happen is what's going to happen, lofty expectations aside.
They could do it in one, theoretically. Comes down to the cost. My point was that it's not as easy as people think. If I'm a GM, I'm squeezing Sweeney for assets more than others. Bruins aren't in a good position to trade. I think they do the latter of course.