Question to the people that are saying Condotta wasn't on any other team's radar, how would you know this? Are you a gm? an agent?
A one year contract isn't a bad thing if he pan's out
Okay. Let's give this guy a chance but the stats aren't great.
At quick glance, he seems like a pretty good skater, strong on his skates and good hockey sense / work ethic.
Might pan out as a bottom 6 guy with good leadership? Low risk signing with the contract being only 1 year.
So. Let this guy compete for a job with the guys you mentioned. You have to keep I mind that there's a good chance they'll be moving out contracts in the summer (if they can). Petry, Wideman ufa, maybe Price, Gallagher , etc.Knowing that right now we are at 47 and that's pretty much what you should have to fill a NHL and a AHL team.....people that think he's just going to fill a space....isn't what Guhle, Mysak, Xhejaj, Stapley, Norlinder and Simoneau were going to do?
And it's fun to crap on Paquette...but if the guy is fine with going back to Laval....you don't want him there?
Out of those 47, clearly Perreault, Clague, Lagesson, Schnarr, Teasdale, Belzile, Dea, and Niku are on the bubble. But are you giving up on Brook? I don't. The Vejdemo experiment is done? Ouellet if he wants to stick around, why wouldn't we?
So yeah, in this league, every contract counts. Even if it's for 1 year. And if you give them, I would have thought it would have been to a top UFA one. That's all.
Will never undestand those posts. Yes, he did. Just like every GM takes EVERYTHING into consideration when they do ANY moves whatsoever. It doesn't mean that as a fan, we have to agree with everything. And he probably have a different view, maybe better than me. Maybe Stapley and Simoneau will not get a contract. Maybe Teasdale and Belzile are out 'cause they are always injured. Maybe, maybe. Yet, all that considered, I have no idea why this 24-year old. That was on nobody's radar throughout the league. That had worst stats than tons of guys who are career ECHL'er.
But we will see what they saw that we don't.
It's not like Waked and his 3-year ELC at least.
You're criticizing the management for signing a player you knew nothing about to a 1-year contract because you are scared it results in another prospect not being signed.
This reminds me of people who criticized Hughes for not trading Chiarot 2 months before the trade deadline because they were scared that Chiarot would get injured...
If a prospect does not get signed, then he likely wouldn't have been signed regardless of the Condotta contract. They are obviously not going to let go of a prospect if they think he's good.
Guys like Stapley and Simoneau could be signed to a 1-year ahl contract, and then to an ELC. This is what they did with Harvey-Pinard.
You might ask why they didn't do that with Condotta? Likely because giving him an nhl contract was their way to entice Condotta to choose the habs over the other teams interested.
1 year ELC vs 3 year ELC. It's not supposed to be hard to see the difference in the impact of both signing.We don't have the same pipeline. Blame Bergevin for everything, excuse the new duo for all they do, at least for now. The joy of being new on the job. Reminds me of Saint-Louis and his players, all is great until the day he will have to take hard decisions with some players next season. The day a player like Gallagher will end up on the fourth line things will change.
Waked is not even a good LNAHer...can't even get a point per game.1 year ELC vs 3 year ELC. It's not supposed to be hard to see the difference in the impact of both signing.
If Condotta sucks, you have a contract anchor for one year. You can probably also easily ship him for future considerations to a team hit hard with injuries (or mutually terminate his contract if he wants to quit)
If Waked sucks (which he did), you have a contract anchor for three years.
The NCAA reporter I posted earlier seems pretty optimistic he can be a decent AHLer, which is something Waked was not. Waked is a good LNAHer.
Waked is not even a good LNAHer...can't even get a point per game.
Ah crap. That is bad management of assets. I must admit though I do not know anything about the guy. Hopefully I am very wrong and he is a world beater.
You're criticizing the management for signing a player you knew nothing about to a 1-year contract because you are scared it results in another prospect not being signed.
This reminds me of people who criticized Hughes for not trading Chiarot 2 months before the trade deadline because they were scared that Chiarot would get injured...
If a prospect does not get signed, then he likely wouldn't have been signed regardless of the Condotta contract. They are obviously not going to let go of a prospect if they think he's good.
Guys like Stapley and Simoneau could be signed to a 1-year ahl contract, and then to an ELC. This is what they did with Harvey-Pinard.
You might ask why they didn't do that with Condotta? Likely because giving him an nhl contract was their way to entice Condotta to choose the habs over the other teams interested.
Music to my ears.24 years old LW
6'2" and 209 lbs
Just completed his 4th year of NCAA at UMass, where he was the captain, and put up 23 pts (10G, 13A) in 33 GP.
You find enough guys who've put in their Due Diligence elsewhere and maybe you find some gems.They obviously see something in him. Hughes loves NCAA players