hotcarle
Registered User
I was kind of disappointed with the deal when Melnyk announced it was for a 5th, but when I heard that we got the 5th too, and we only gave up a 4th, I felt nothing about the trade.
Other than the Alzner signing, you listed a bunch of small moves that didn't cost anything significant. These type of acquisitions are standard for playoff contenders. Looks alot like you are reaching for evidence to support a failed theory.King, Ott and Martinsen were not good deadline deals, we got the boot first round. We needed scoring, we got scrubs. Alzner and Shlemko were not good moves. Agostino and Chaput were busts. Montreals scouting staff in the west is among the worst in the league, Crawford should have been canned years ago.
Other than the Alzner signing, you listed a bunch of small moves that didn't cost anything significant. These type of acquisitions are standard for playoff contenders. Looks alot like you are reaching for evidence to support a failed theory.
Eklund hasn't mentioned anything so I doubt this is accurate
Trades that do not help your team, are never good trades. He took a really decent team, heading strong into the playoffs, and failed to do anything but make the team worse. We couldn't score against the Rangers, we needed offense, and his solution was King, Martinsen and Ott. He played a bad game of chess with Markov and Rads, lost two more really good players there as well.
So we've had near the worst PP all year, and he can't fix it either. So what's the plan? Thompson and Weise? Will we get the 'trades are hard' speech again?