It's simple....there is a running thread of posters calling us (Leafs fans) out for never offering enough....doesn't matter that Hamilton/Hamonic went for picks...doesn't matter that Vatanen just went for a 3C+...for the Leafs on this board, the minute any D is mentioned, it's Marner/Nylander++ or GTFO. So, that's my new blanket offer....maybe we can shift opinions on her from "Leafs fans always offer crap" to "Leafs fans offer to much"....might be refreshing.
Ok got it.
I think part of the problem is the perception of value vs desire/need. Let me explain, Leafs have a need/desire to get a D....so they offer up a package of what they feel is fair “value” (which may actually be fair value) BUT the other team declines b/c there is no desire/need for them to trade X D player even if the value is fair (albeit they rarely admit the value is fair) so they decline barring an overpayment (aka Marner/Nylander). Round & round the debate goes, people get frustrated, throw out barbs or insults and before we know it both sides are insulting the other sides posters, players, organizations, etc.
Example: Trouba, there is literally not a single player I would trade Trouba for from the Leafs at this point barring AM. See what I did there? I’m not saying Nylander or Marner aren’t good players or equal value....I have zero desire to trade Trouba so I throw out an overpayment which just makes you frustrated, annoyed and likely creates a pissing match for three days. We all do this on the site at times, I think most do it intentionally to get attention but that’s just my opinion. IMO just better to say he isn’t available then stir up a pissing match.
Warning to the Leaf fan (yet to be determined) about to quote me saying a Jets fan claimed Trouba holds the same value as AM......I didn’t say that in the least just chill out. Just using him as an example that has been discussed to death in the past.