Proposal: MTL & STL

[Lockin17]

OK let's say Levshunov is available at #5
MTL calls the Blues,,,,
MTL : hey there you want that guy.
STL : Frack yeah he would be one of top D core for the next 15 years.
MTL : Fine then give me Dvorsky and #16 and i'll had a great prospect in Farrell to replace the lost of Dalibor.
STL : Hell yeah sign me up.

MTL : thinking (Danm i should of asked for more....)

MTL : #5 + Farrell
for
STL : Dvorsky + #16

Click to read more...

 

[Mrfenn92]

Don’t see the blues doing it

 

[Nico Cauzuki]

Terrible much rather draft at #5

 

[Frenzy31]

Why are the Blues doing this?

 

[Lockin17]

Why are the Blues doing this?

at #5 Blues would get a really good top 1 D either left or right while getting a good prospect in Farrell.
Habs are set on D and since Demidov and Celebrini will be gone mind as well drop down a bit and get a player like Greentree while getting a A prospect in Dvorsky

 

[Junohockeyfan]

Habs would prefer to keep the #5. Blues need to keep their pick and their former 1st.

No deal.

 

[Eegs]

I can't decide what I'd do here as a Habs fan...Nice proposal OP.

Edit: I say this as someone that is not very high on Farrell though.

 

[Lockin17]

Then MTL trade #16 + jets #24 + CGY first for CGY #8

Dvorsky
Catton/Iginla

They would make a movie out of this loll

 

[MajorWeber]

Montreal doesn't touch that

 

[Junohockeyfan]

Then MTL trade #16 + jets #24 + CGY first for CGY #8

Dvorsky
Catton/Iginla

They would make a movie out of this loll

That's insane. Are you MrInsane?

 

[Lockin17]

That's insane. Are you MrInsane?

you don't think #16 + #24 + CGY first 2025 for #8 makes sense for CGY ?
Maybe not,, but im not insane ..... that's 3 first picks

 

[MajorWeber]

you don't think #16 + #24 + CGY first 2025 for #8 makes sense for CGY ?
Maybe not but not insane ..... that's 3 first picks

When are y'all gonna understand that its almost 90%+ chances that it will be FLA 1st and NOT CGY 1st in 2025....

 

[Lockin17]

When are y'all gonna understand that its almost 90%+ chances that it will be FLA 1st and NOT CGY 1st in 2025....

are you from the future ??

CGY could very well be around #11 to #15

 

[MajorWeber]

are you from the future ??

No, but I understand the conditions and I can see where the teams are at. Calgary will most likely be a bottom team next year and Florida should still compete. Therefore, Montreal will receive the worst of the 2 picks and it's more than likely gonna be FLA's pick,

 

[Lockin17]

No, but I understand the conditions and I can see where the teams are at. Calgary will most likely be a bottom team next year and Florida should still compete. Therefore, Montreal will receive the worst of the 2 picks and it's more than likely gonna be FLA's pick,

like i said CGY pick could very well be outside of the top 10 ,
Florida as a shit load of UFA to sign. they might have a hard time next year and miss the playoff.

 

[Ted Hoffman]

Then MTL trade #16 + jets #24 + CGY first for CGY #8

Dvorsky
Catton/Iginla

They would make a movie out of this loll

The title of it would be "How to Overpay At the Draft By Really Trying."

 

[MajorWeber]

like i said CGY pick could very well be outside of the top 10 ,
Florida as a shit load of UFA to sign. they might have a hard time next year and miss the playoff.

I agree, but there's too many conditions to start trading that pick away while retaining any sort of value on it. Way too many IF on those conditions.

 

[Lockin17]

The title of it would be "How to Overpay At the Draft By Really Trying."

Arrgg you bummer

 

[Lockin17]

I agree, but there's too many conditions to start trading that pick away while retaining any sort of value on it. Way too many IF on those conditions.

there,, if you agree that means
first : you don't see the future ;-)
Second: The pick might not end up being Florida pick at all and be CGY #11

 

[Ted Hoffman]

For perspective: while no one has gone from 16 to 8 at the draft, Atlanta in 2005 did go from 8 down to 16 in 2 moves.

The total cost was a 2nd (#49), a 7th (#207) and another 2nd (#41).

No GM is giving up 2 1st-round picks - and especially a 1st in '24 currently at #24 and a 1st in '25 that could be ... who the hell knows, based on all the conditions, but it's likely to be a top-16 pick based on how the Flames will probably be next year - to go from 16 to 8.

 

[MajorWeber]

there,, if you agree that means
first : you don't see the future ;-)
Second: The pick might not end up being Florida pick at all and be CGY #11

Yes, but you won't get prime value on that pick until you know what it is. It could be 11 or it could be 19. I just can't see that pick being moved until we know what it is.

 

[jfhabs]

I think we need quality over quantity. Habs need elite talent. While Dvorsky is a great prospect I am high on , Leshunov or whoever will be there at 5 this year is a tier above imo. Not a bad proposal.

I guess I might do it depending on who's available at 5 other than Leshunov. A good player can slip at 16, but it should be 1-2 tier below at this rank

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

The problem with this theory is there is no chance Levshunov is making it out of the top 4

 

[Lockin17]

I think we need quality over quantity. Habs need elite talent. While Dvorsky is a great prospect I am high on , Leshunov or whoever will be there at 5 this year is a tier above imo. Not a bad proposal.

I guess I might do it depending on who's available at 5 other than Leshunov. A good player can slip at 16, but it should be 1-2 tier below at this rank

Well if Levshunov is there at #5 that means Demidov, Lindstrom, Catton are gone

 

[Blanick]

Uh yeah St. Louis isn't touching that. Last years draft was much much deeper than this years and while we definitely need defense it won't be at the cost of Dvorsky who is penciled in as our much needed 2C in a few years. Honestly there are very few players for this years draft class top 10 that I would take over last years 1-10 picks. Dvorsky in this draft class would likely be a top 5 pick and then you want us to add a mid 1st on top of it? I guess you think the former 4th round D+4 year undersized forward who is averaging just above a half a point a game in AHL covers that gap. This proposal is bad and you should feel bad.