Agalloch
EliteProspects
Seriously? Therrien is not worse than any other coaches? How many other coaches would you say are worse than Therrien then?
We're talking about players playing on their potential. To actually coach, he's bottom 5.
Seriously? Therrien is not worse than any other coaches? How many other coaches would you say are worse than Therrien then?
I don't believe DSP has suddenly broken out. It's just a small sample size. Same with Matteau, too early to tell if he's an NHL player.
Too easy to get carried away with this. It's still a scrub for scrub trade.
Same with Matteau, too early to tell if he's an NHL player.
I don't believe DSP has suddenly broken out. It's just a small sample size. Same with Matteau, too early to tell if he's an NHL player.
Too easy to get carried away with this. It's still a scrub for scrub trade.
Be fair here, you had zero problem with it when this trade was made.
I highly doubt this is the new DSP. Before we call MB an idiot for this I think we should see how this goes. In my view it will end up being what we all thought it was to begin with... an inconsequential trade.Who cares where I was? Anyway, we never win at this. If I would have had problems with it, I'd be called saying that I always came in when I'm right...or I would have been rememberd my position on Kristo and others. The idea here vehiculated by certain people is that professionnals knows best. SAme pros who look awfully bad right now.
As far as evaluating players on my own end well yeah....I guess I wasn't again. But mostly because of Therrien's usage. I guess I would have needed 417 to remind me that yep....DSP HAD some offensive skills as he, compared to another player, HAD an offensive history and he COULD be a solution up front. 417 wasn't around this time. So hey...I misjudged the deal. IT MAKES NO ****ING DIFFERENCE IN THE INEPTITUDE OF THIS MANAGEMENT. They take the décisions. I don't.
Of course, we ALL expect him to cool down. Geez, you have to hope he will...he's a PPG player....I mean, tell me we didn't trade a 82-point guy. Since we didn't....yeah, he will cool down. Still...he will be better than half if not all of our bottom 6 players.
certainly DSP is a better player to have hang around your bottom 6 than Matteau.
I dislike this trade for the same reason I disliked the Sekac trade. I think it's indicative of a lack of patience with young players, in this case DSP probably got less opportunity than Sekac.
I can see the logic of this trade only if you think DSP will make a million more or so than Matteau next year. But certainly DSP is a better player to have hang around your bottom 6 than Matteau.
A lack of patience AND ability to develop different types of players differently within a single group. Everyone goes through the same grinder/extruder before getting wrapped in the same bland packaging for sale.
I don't believe DSP has suddenly broken out. It's just a small sample size. Same with Matteau, too early to tell if he's an NHL player.
Too easy to get carried away with this. It's still a scrub for scrub trade.
Ask two questions.
Are the Habs a better team with DSP?
Are the Habs a better team with Matteau?
Clearly the answer to both is no. Neither are impact players and neither will make the Habs better or worse.
Ask two questions.
Are the Habs a better team with DSP?
Are the Habs a better team with Matteau?
Clearly the answer to both is no. Neither are impact players and neither will make the Habs better or worse.
Ask two questions.
Are the Habs a better team with DSP?
Are the Habs a better team with Matteau?
Clearly the answer to both is no. Neither are impact players and neither will make the Habs better or worse.
Are we talking about Habs's development issues here, or making sausages?
The real question is whether the difference between DSP and Matteau's cost (~1m) will be used to acquire a top 6 forward. For example, DSP and Hudler signed at 5m or Matteau and Ladd signed at 6m.
DSP would be tied for 4th in goals scored for the Habs.
Are you talking about a $1000 difference, or a $1,000,000 difference?
Bergevin could have easily re-signed RFA Smith-Pelly at a minimal increase.
Is this surely the case? I think that logic still applies if Smith-Pelly "only" makes more than 500k as well.
I just think there are more effective places to pinch pennies from like Eller, or ideally if possible, Emelin or Desharnais.
A lack of patience AND ability to develop different types of players differently within a single group. Everyone goes through the same grinder/extruder before getting wrapped in the same bland packaging for sale.
Are we talking about Habs's development issues here, or making sausage?
Right?!
So we agree that salary considerations should not have factored into trading DSP?