The first two Rangers goals came off soft plays from Kane (not clearing the puck, then not protecting it behind his own goal line). I have no problem with benching a guy who's not buying in at the same level as the 40-year-old who scored two or the AHL call-ups giving their all.So we're down a goal, Kane sits while Sorenson shows ineptitude of epic proportions, great job Bobby...
If there was ever a season to bench a player to send a message, this is it.
its almost like its not THAT important.Sharks again mocking the importance of the "shots on goal" statistic
Sorensen I'll give you. He was horrible tonight, couldn't catch a pass or get a shot away to save his life. But Kellman arguably did more to create offense than Kane did, and wasn't directly responsible for two goals against. If you have a guy who's supposed to be a tough, physical 30-goal scorer, and he's getting outworked, outscored, and guys like Stefan Noesen and Alex True are doing more for possession, I have no problem with sticking him on the bench.I was starting to lean toward keeping Boughner, but not after this game. I understand wanting to send a message to Kane. Fine, whatever. He's only one of the few guys who scores on a team that cannot. Rip him in the video room.
How do you justify sitting Kane when you watch Sorenson and Schellman (no shots!) kill the offense and turn the puck over. LaBanc puts in another game where he proves the argument that he's no more than a 3rd liner. Middleton and Heed did an excellent job ceding the zone all night long. Accountability is great if everyone is held accountable. I'd be pissed if I was Kane.
He seems like the kind of coach that loves grinders. The fancy stats look good; the counting stats do not.
The first two Rangers goals came off soft plays from Kane (not clearing the puck, then not protecting it behind his own goal line). I have no problem with benching a guy who's not buying in at the same level as the 40-year-old who scored two or the AHL call-ups giving their all.
I get what you're saying, and I agree to a point. But Sorensen and Kane have different roles and different expectations. Sorensen was garbage and makes me miss Melker, but Kane didn't play like a "legit scoring threat." Noah Gregor and Alex True had more and better opportunities tonight than he did, and you can't suck at the marquee part of your job while also slacking off at the "work" part. Boughner's been consistent at that all season (scratched Sorensen a game, benched Meier for the third earlier in the year), and I think it's one of the few positives about this season. At least we know he's holding guys accountableWhat message was being sent? His lackadaisical play leading to NYR's 2nd? When he had bailed out the D before Panarin poked it loose, don't get me wrong I yelled on 1st look when i thought he passed it infront, on 2nd look sure he was careless but we're sitting one of our only legit scoring threats while letting Sore-nson continue to fudge play after play after play?
So the message to Kane is you have to be better, but Sorenson can play like a hump all he likes & we don't care about that?
Sorensen I'll give you. He was horrible tonight, couldn't catch a pass or get a shot away to save his life. But Kellman arguably did more to create offense than Kane did, and wasn't directly responsible for two goals against. If you have a guy who's supposed to be a tough, physical 30-goal scorer, and he's getting outworked, outscored, and guys like Stefan Noesen and Alex True are doing more for possession, I have no problem with sticking him on the bench.
Given what I was already typing in reply, we're 100% on the same pageI get that, forgetting his inability to clear led to their 1st as well, but hell bench sorenson too, it's like Melker's out so Sorenson upped his suck to a whole new level to compensate?
Different paycheck, different expectations, but Kane's been out 3 games, what's Sorenson's excuse?
Just infuriating watching every possession die on his stick, if he's not failing in coverage, battles & passing, he's taking pointless weak shots straight at the D, he's forgotten how to freakin play the game.
I was starting to lean toward keeping Boughner, but not after this game. I understand wanting to send a message to Kane. Fine, whatever. He's only one of the few guys who scores on a team that cannot. Rip him in the video room.
How do you justify sitting Kane when you watch Sorenson and Schellman (no shots!) kill the offense and turn the puck over. LaBanc puts in another game where he proves the argument that he's no more than a 3rd liner. Middleton and Heed did an excellent job ceding the zone all night long. Accountability is great if everyone is held accountable. I'd be pissed if I was Kane.
He seems like the kind of coach that loves grinders. The fancy stats look good; the counting stats do not.
Given what I was already typing in reply, we're 100% on the same page
I agree with you, Sorensen just hasn't been good enough in any facet of his game this season. Bad decisionmaking, bad hands, bad passes, no scoring. I'd rather have seen Blichfeld or Suomela in his place, and maybe we will tomorrow. But not being the worst forward on the team is in no way an excuse for a guy who's paid to be one of the best, and I'd argue that Sorensen played closer to his "ceiling" than Kane did tonight. It's just that Sorensen sucks when he's good, too.
Sorensen I'll give you. He was horrible tonight, couldn't catch a pass or get a shot away to save his life. But Kellman arguably did more to create offense than Kane did, and wasn't directly responsible for two goals against. If you have a guy who's supposed to be a tough, physical 30-goal scorer, and he's getting outworked, outscored, and guys like Stefan Noesen and Alex True are doing more for possession, I have no problem with sticking him on the bench.
Feels good to vent with likeminded, frustrated friends. 3am here, g/f is like "shouldn't we be going to bed now the game's over?" I explain we're just getting some post-game feelings out. She asks "Sorenson?"
I'd rather have Haley at this point, including his current injury...
Because Kane was directly responsible for the Rags first two goals with his lazy lackadaisical play. I love that BB benched him. Bust your ass and play hard every shift or sit; No superstar treatment. This team needs more of that and hasn’t gotten it in the past. It’s great to see.
I'm with you in that it creates the right kind of team environment. I just think if you're benching Kane for lazy play, then other guys also needed to be benched. Sorenson kicking the puck around is lazy fundamentals as well. LaBanc's poor decision making also needs to be addressed. And, if the standard is to bench lazy plays that result in goals, then this should happen much more frequently and to all the players involved.
I feel like Boughner's been pretty consistent about that stuff all along. He pulled Timo and someone else (Labanc?) from the third period of a game right after he took over, scratched Sorensen the next week, and it seems like he's been pretty clear with the players as far as expectations go. Labanc and Meier are both making better decisions since he took over, and one thing I've particularly noticed is that both guys are taking the puck to the middle of the ice more. I'm guessing that Kane didn't do himself any favors with the Twitter rant at DOPS and things like appearing at the NYSE on a day where he was suspended.I'm with you in that it creates the right kind of team environment. I just think if you're benching Kane for lazy play, then other guys also needed to be benched. Sorenson kicking the puck around is lazy fundamentals as well. LaBanc's poor decision making also needs to be addressed. And, if the standard is to bench lazy plays that result in goals, then this should happen much more frequently and to all the players involved.
What do the WAR numbers look like for Evander Kane?
An extremely soft clearing attempt that directly lead to the first goal and some pretty lackadaisical puckhandling right around the net that directly lead to the 2nd goal. In his defense, the pokecheck from Panarin on the 2nd goal magicked the puck to Zibanejad somehow. You usually don't expect a pokecheck like that to cleanly go to the other guy with a clean look at the backdoorMissed the game, what’s Kane do to get benched?
If our pick was to be the #1 pick, wouldn't that have been a franchise first? Anyway, does not really matter since we can't turn back the past. All we can do is look forward and hope that DW can make us more competitive next year.Looking at the standings there is a really good chance the Sens could win the lottery with our pick. Only the wings and Kings might finish with a worst record than us and still a chance for the Kings to pass us. With all our injuries and trading off guys by the deadline I can't see us winning many more games this season. Though I would rather the Sens win the lottery than the Kings or Ducks. If only we had our #1 pick I would be so excited right now.
What do the WAR numbers look like for Evander Kane?
Did Kane do something so egregious that he needed to be benched for the 3rd period in a game we were losing?