CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 37,864
- 11,223
Agreed with Hawks/Kings
I'd rank the Canucks
Scoring 3/5
Defense 2/5
Goaltending 2/5
Coaching 2/5
Determination? Uhh 2/5 I guess. Rattled pretty easily
11/25
Rangers
Scoring - 5/5
Defense - 4/5
Goaltending - 4.5/5
Determination - 5/5
Coaching - 4/5
23/25
I feel like this is not very realistic.
Agreed with Hawks/Kings
I'd rank the Canucks
Scoring 3/5
Defense 2/5
Goaltending 2/5
Coaching 2/5
Determination? Uhh 2/5 I guess. Rattled pretty easily
11/25
Rangers
Scoring - 5/5
Defense - 4/5
Goaltending - 4.5/5
Determination - 5/5
Coaching - 4/5
23/25
Are you grading the Rangers on a game they played the best of their lives and the team they played against were injured and on a long trip or something?
Your grade doesn't coincide with their current standings
the Blackhawks, I don't think it is even a question
Rangers
Scoring - 5/5
Defense - 4/5
Goaltending - 4.5/5
Determination - 5/5
Coaching - 4/5
23/25
Rangers
Scoring - 5/5
Defense - 4/5
Goaltending - 4.5/5
Determination - 5/5
Coaching - 4/5
23/25
Ummmm....what? So does that make the Kings 25/25 seeing as they beat the Rangers in the final?
2 Cups in 3 years, why would the Kings not be 25/25?
Who said anything about past success? The Kings won the Cup a few months ago with pretty much the same roster.
You what what, sometimes I forge this site has a 10-day memory. My bad.
"2 cups in 3 years".... you did
The Kings aren't 25/25 even if they did win a cup months ago.
Rangers aren't 23/25 because they made it to the finals months ago
you know what I remember? you flipping out and losing all faith in the Rangers after the first or second loss to the Sens in 2012. I would be embarrassed TBH
Because this thread isn't about past success... its about current roster/determination/coaching
Rangers aren't close to 23/25 and the Kings arent 25/25
Kings are 25/25.