Hasekperreault23
Registered User
- Nov 23, 2018
- 2,080
- 906
At worse read the whole post not just what you want to readShould have waited two more days and then got the 3rd rounder?
At worse read the whole post not just what you want to readShould have waited two more days and then got the 3rd rounder?
Not a complaint its an OPINION you know we are still entitled to for now anywaysSince Ralph left, his xG% was 34%. The narrative that he was playing well after the coaching change is not backed up by the stats.
Montour is just not that good. And waiting until the deadline could have been a game of musical chairs where the Sabres didn't have an offer for him because teams added other players.
I have no issue with the return or the timing of the deal. And most of the complaints about the return are people ticked off about the state of the franchise and just complaining to complain.
this organization loves to trade guys away for half of what they paid for them. they simply love to do it, and, apparently, will never stop.
having said that, they got a bad defenceman off their roster, so at least this trade moves them in the right direction.
We think he fits going toward because he’s developed into a good mobile defensive dmen who plays with a physical edge and will stick up for teammates. A skill set badly needed on this teamProbably says more about the state of the Sabres that we still think Borgen has a chance/role here long-term. Guhle was one of my favorite prospects but at this point, it's just not happening. Perhaps they can battle it out for an AHL championship eventually?
this organization loves to trade guys away for half of what they paid for them. they simply love to do it, and, apparently, will never stop.
having said that, they got a bad defenceman off their roster, so at least this trade moves them in the right direction.
Which one would you be willing to pay the most for:this organization loves to trade guys away for half of what they paid for them. they simply love to do it, and, apparently, will never stop.
having said that, they got a bad defenceman off their roster, so at least this trade moves them in the right direction.
This is more proof of a gm w a list to fulfill.. Not a saavy poker player waiting for a tell.. Hall was tough.. Montour for a third.. Ill get behind the kevin abuse in this. And still having Eakin out A living.
It's like the inverse of the "Patriot Way: road to a modern day dynasty", that the media never shuts up about.It's funny. Starting out with $1 million, doing some financial trades, and ending up with $500,000 is how rich people go broke.
That's how this franchise has lived for a while now.
As long as Pegula is going to be hood-winked by the likes of Ralph Krueger and think he's a good hire, it will probably continue.
I hope Adams is better than the past crew that has come in here.
This organization needs to get a lot *smarter* and fast.
The buy high, sell low Sabres. Awesome. Fire everyone
It's like the inverse of the "Patriot Way: road to a modern day dynasty", that the media never shuts up about.
The "Sabres Way: buy high, sell low, road to a record setting playoff drought".
It's not Adams fault that Botts paid what he did for Montour and it's good that Adams got something for him. But it doesn't change the fact that Montour was still a big fat L for this franchise, he was a loss of assets and value.Let's consider the options for Montour :
- Keep him here to play out the string, knowing either you don't want to keep him, or he doesn't want to come back.
- Trade him for whatever you can possibly get back in return.
How exactly did they screw this up?
It's not Adams fault that Botts paid what he did for Montour and it's good that Adams got something for him. But it doesn't change the fact that Montour was still a big fat L for this franchise, he was a loss of assets and value.
It's like if your finical advisor bought stock for you at $100 a share and then you fired him after the value tanked. Your new advisor sold the stock off at $20 so you got something back, which is better than $0. But you still lost $80.
The other issue is what can he really expect out of a 3rd rounder? When's the last time the Sabres drafted and developed a 3rd rounder into anything? $20 might have been too kind in my analogy.Sure. But I got SOMETHING more than $0 back, which in some cases is a big win. Because I can now reinvest that $20 on something I hope will turn out better. Can't do that with $0!
The other issue is what can he really expect out of a 3rd rounder? When's the last time the Sabres drafted and developed a 3rd rounder into anything? $20 might have been too kind in my analogy.
Why didn't we retention salary and get more?
FairFlorida had loads of cap space and I doubt they had a team that was willing to give up a 2nd for Montour with retention.
When's the last time the Sabres drafted and developed a 3rd rounder into anything?
Reminds me of an old adage derived from people trying to get rich investing in third world countries: "Wanna know the best way to end up with a million dollars in country X? Arrive there with two million."The buy high, sell low Sabres. Awesome. Fire everyone