I actually wouldn't vote for Rivera on the HOF Ballot. I wouldn't ever vote for any reliever though. Pretty much by definition a reliever if a pitcher who wasn't good enough to be a starter or they would be a starter as the value a starter can generate is much much higher than the value any RP can. So many pitchers (Rivera included) were bad SP who then turned into good/great RP (Betances/Miller/Perkins/Joba/Matusz/Britton/Parnell/Clippard/Davis/Duke/T. Wood/Delgado/Benoit) just to name some that are active. And the number of guys who went in reverse (Bad RP to good SP are so few..looks CJ Wilson/Colby Lewis? Chris Sale doesn't really count given his draft status and such and that he was rushed to try to help immediately).
To me voting for a reliever would be like voting for someone like Dominic Moore for the NHL HOF. I can't think of a great example but someone whose the best at an inferior role. Like maybe Dominic Moore is the BEST 4th line center. But so what? Just means he wasn't good enough to be the best 3rd line center or 2nd line center or 1st line center. It's rewarding success to players who aren't good enough/capable (and not having endurance/multiple pitches counts here) of performing in a more important role.
To me voting for a reliever would be like voting for someone like Dominic Moore for the NHL HOF.
This doesn't work until starters can go 9 innings every 5 days, or until they can concoct a rotation that somehow splits starts between everyone in a bullpen or something. If it was so cut and dry than every failed starting pitcher would become a good reliever.
I think as long as the concept of the "relief pitcher" exists, the most elite relievers should be in the HOF.
People who deny that Rivera does not have first ballot HOF credentials make no sense to me.
Relievers used to be guys who weren't good enough to be starters. It's since become very much a position for which guys are groomed.
Whats up with Gary Cohen these days and his HR calls? I have never heard a worse butchered call than Cespedes grand slam the other night and he has many others lately too.
That's really not all that accurate, Machine. You have guys go in the minors as long as they can before converting them to relief. Some guys aren't cut out for starting at all, but I would hardly consider that "grooming" them. The value of a starter is exponentially more than that of a reliever. It's not even close.
That's really not all that accurate, Machine. You have guys go in the minors as long as they can before converting them to relief. Some guys aren't cut out for starting at all, but I would hardly consider that "grooming" them. The value of a starter is exponentially more than that of a reliever. It's not even close.
As a whole I'd rather have a good rotation over a good bullpen yes, but I'd rather have one elite closer who's pitching between 50 and 70 games, almost all of them close games, than one elite starter who plays once a week.
In other words I'd take the 2015 Mets staff over the 2009 Yankees staff, but I'd take Mariano over Bumgarner.