OT: MLB Thread Part IX: I want my #BaeRod royalties

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlueshirtBlitz

Foolish Samurai
Aug 2, 2010
21,431
30
New York
I actually wouldn't vote for Rivera on the HOF Ballot. I wouldn't ever vote for any reliever though. Pretty much by definition a reliever if a pitcher who wasn't good enough to be a starter or they would be a starter as the value a starter can generate is much much higher than the value any RP can. So many pitchers (Rivera included) were bad SP who then turned into good/great RP (Betances/Miller/Perkins/Joba/Matusz/Britton/Parnell/Clippard/Davis/Duke/T. Wood/Delgado/Benoit) just to name some that are active. And the number of guys who went in reverse (Bad RP to good SP are so few..looks CJ Wilson/Colby Lewis? Chris Sale doesn't really count given his draft status and such and that he was rushed to try to help immediately).

To me voting for a reliever would be like voting for someone like Dominic Moore for the NHL HOF. I can't think of a great example but someone whose the best at an inferior role. Like maybe Dominic Moore is the BEST 4th line center. But so what? Just means he wasn't good enough to be the best 3rd line center or 2nd line center or 1st line center. It's rewarding success to players who aren't good enough/capable (and not having endurance/multiple pitches counts here) of performing in a more important role.


This doesn't work until starters can go 9 innings every 5 days, or until they can concoct a rotation that somehow splits starts between everyone in a bullpen or something. If it was so cut and dry than every failed starting pitcher would become a good reliever.

I think as long as the concept of the "relief pitcher" exists, the most elite relievers should be in the HOF.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,365
12,731
Long Island
This doesn't work until starters can go 9 innings every 5 days, or until they can concoct a rotation that somehow splits starts between everyone in a bullpen or something. If it was so cut and dry than every failed starting pitcher would become a good reliever.

I think as long as the concept of the "relief pitcher" exists, the most elite relievers should be in the HOF.

No. Why would you say "Every"? There are so many guys who were awful SP that became good or great RP and very few the other way around. Rivera is obviously the best of them. I'm certainly not arguing that he isn't. The best RP is essentially someone who wasn't good enough to be a starter and then was the best at a less important/easier role. I don't think you deserve to be rewarded for being the best at a role like that.

Should the guy who is the best pinch hitter of all time make the HOF? The best special teams player in the NFL? The best 4th line center/3rd pairing defenseman? The best backup goalie? The best utility/platoon player in MLB? The best 6th man in the NBA? I'm on the fence about DH's but would lead more to yes than no as they do have a huge contribution offensively and play almost every inning of every game. Not playing the field does hurt them but then again..if say David Ortiz did play the field I think that should actually hurt his HOF chances relative to DH since he's so bad there it'd make him even less valuable a player if he were playing the field.
 
Last edited:

sbjnyc

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
5,966
2,026
New York
People who deny that Rivera does not have first ballot HOF credentials make no sense to me.

Is that a triple negative?

There are 6 closers in the HoF. It is hard to argue that Rivera wasn't the best of all time let alone the best of his generation. And I am not a yankee fan.
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
142,909
113,958
NYC
Relievers used to be guys who weren't good enough to be starters. It's since become very much a position for which guys are groomed.
 

sbjnyc

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
5,966
2,026
New York
Everyone has a hit tonight except cespedes.

Edit: Even crazier - mets have more extra base hits in 3 innings than the 8 last night.

Correction: everyone has a hit.
 
Last edited:

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,712
32,940
Maryland
When was the last time a pitcher allowed 9 or more XBH in one start?

This thing they do in Colorado...it isn't baseball.
 

darko

Registered User
Feb 16, 2009
70,269
7,797
I understand not voting for the closers but there's 5 in HOF already and Rivera's numbers blow them all out of the water.

Hoyt Wilhelm is widely considered the 2nd greatest closer of all time. His ERA+ is 147
Rivera's 205. Anyone not voting for Rivera is nuts.
 

surf

Wheres the Reggae?
Oct 2, 2002
2,179
13
sea bright nj
Whats up with Gary Cohen these days and his HR calls? I have never heard a worse butchered call than Cespedes grand slam the other night and he has many others lately too.
 

Hunter Gathers

The Crown
Feb 27, 2002
106,716
11,933
parts unknown
Relievers used to be guys who weren't good enough to be starters. It's since become very much a position for which guys are groomed.

That's really not all that accurate, Machine. You have guys go in the minors as long as they can before converting them to relief. Some guys aren't cut out for starting at all, but I would hardly consider that "grooming" them. The value of a starter is exponentially more than that of a reliever. It's not even close.
 

Hunter Gathers

The Crown
Feb 27, 2002
106,716
11,933
parts unknown
Whats up with Gary Cohen these days and his HR calls? I have never heard a worse butchered call than Cespedes grand slam the other night and he has many others lately too.

Did you really watch the HR, though? I lost sight of the ball myself. I don't blame him. No one on AA really knew what was up, either, at the time.

His call last night on Tejada's grab and toss was OUTSTANDING.
 

sbjnyc

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
5,966
2,026
New York
That's really not all that accurate, Machine. You have guys go in the minors as long as they can before converting them to relief. Some guys aren't cut out for starting at all, but I would hardly consider that "grooming" them. The value of a starter is exponentially more than that of a reliever. It's not even close.

I'd rather have a good bullpen than just 1 good starter But I'd rather have 3 good starters than a good bullpen. Or something along those lines.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,712
32,940
Maryland
What a huge start by Verrett. The bullpen really needed a rest. He probably would have been able to go for the CG had Terry not inexplicably pulled him. Regardless, he really gave the team a great performance. I'm thrilled that we got the kid back.
 

rktaker

Guest
wright comes back tomorrow and i am nervous he's my favorite player but who knows if he's 100%
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
142,909
113,958
NYC
That's really not all that accurate, Machine. You have guys go in the minors as long as they can before converting them to relief. Some guys aren't cut out for starting at all, but I would hardly consider that "grooming" them. The value of a starter is exponentially more than that of a reliever. It's not even close.

As a whole I'd rather have a good rotation over a good bullpen yes, but I'd rather have one elite closer who's pitching between 50 and 70 games, almost all of them close games, than one elite starter who plays once a week.

In other words I'd take the 2015 Mets staff over the 2009 Yankees staff, but I'd take Mariano over Bumgarner.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,365
12,731
Long Island
As a whole I'd rather have a good rotation over a good bullpen yes, but I'd rather have one elite closer who's pitching between 50 and 70 games, almost all of them close games, than one elite starter who plays once a week.

In other words I'd take the 2015 Mets staff over the 2009 Yankees staff, but I'd take Mariano over Bumgarner.

I mean there's really nothing to say other than this is incorrect and it's even more incorrect in playoff baseball when starters throw a higher percent of a teams total innings than a starter would in the regular season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad