Continue. Last thread was over.
If anyone has a witty thread title, please share!
If anyone has a witty thread title, please share!
Honestly, the only deal people should be sour about is the dickey deal.
Every one of his other trades, in context, were fine/great.
This is the man who got us donaldson..
I'm sour about the Esmil Rogers for Yan Gomes trade AND the dickey deal.
I keep repeating this, but nobody should be sour about Gomes because nobody saw that coming from Gomes. And anyone who says they did is lying.
Yes, AA did trade lots of prospects away but it was for players that had years left on their deals. The only rental player he traded for was Price. He traded prospects away for established major league players under control for years.
Regarding my post in the previous thread - yes, I know that Shapiro is not the GM. However we know that Atkins is not autonomous and that Shapiro has his hands in every potential deal.
What made the AA era unique is the fact that the GM had virtually complete control over every move. It was specifically Shapiro that put an end to this, which means that every move is now made through collective discussion.
So I think it makes sense to compare AA to Shapiro.
Not sure how anybody could honestly say the Marlins deal wasn't a complete loss for us. It was an awful trade. AA was great at drafting and building a farm(Or pitchers to be exact he avoided position players like the plague) but got very short sighted and made some bad moves, and now we are left with a team with a core on the wrong side of 30 zero pay roll flexibility and a bottom 10/5 farm system. AA was not the worst GM and I am not trying to say that what so ever, I liked that he wasn't afraid to make big moves, it paid off with Donaldson but in other cases it didn't. In the way that he wasn't the worst....he also isn't the god that some people seem to see him as now. I always come back to it but half way through the season last year there were people calling for his head and then 6 months later people were ready to grab there pitch forks when they had the gaul to not give him free reign on the team.
I keep repeating this, but nobody should be sour about Gomes because nobody saw that coming from Gomes. And anyone who says they did is lying.
Not sure how anybody could honestly say the Marlins deal wasn't a complete loss for us. It was an awful trade.
Lets break it down then:
Henderson Alvarez: Had a 6.45 era through 4 starts last season before an injury struck - granted free agency after the season, signed in Oakland, yet to pitch. His numbers may look decent this year being in a favourable park.
Anthony DeSclafani: Traded to the Reds for Mat Latos. Had a 4.05 era, with a 1.34 whip. Currently in rehab for an oblique strain.
Yunel Escobar: Does anyone care about that jackass factory - to borrow a phrase from King of the Hill - he had to go with all the baggage he had.
Adeiny Hechavarria: Batting .259 with a .635 ops through 4 seasons in Miami. His best season was a 2.1 WAR season. Hasn't had over .6 any other season. Remains to be seen if he can keep a decent pace like last season.
Jake Marisnick: Traded to Houston - batting .105 through 20 games - had 105k:18bb last season through 133 games and 339 abs.
Justin Nicolino: 4.09 era through 17 career starts over two seasons. 1.26 WHIP. FIP of 5.14 though 5 starts so far this season.
Jeff Mathis: Yea...Hasn't hit over .200 in any season with Miami in his four seasons there.
------------------------------------------------
Is there anyone here that we should be losing sleep over? Maybe Nicolino and DeSclafani?
Was it as bad as you're saying? I doubt it.
We basically traded a bunch of young, cheap and serviceable depth for expensive,old and declining play from 3 players that were over the hill. Yeah nobody on the Marlins side has turned into a star thankfully but we basically traded them for the ability to pay Reyes and Buerhle just under $40 million what that group of players could have done at a fraction of the cost. It's not all just what the players have become in a vaccum, it was terrible asset management and cost us in financial flexibility. It isn't as bad as the Dickey trade not even close, but it was a clear loss and that's all my point is. He lost that trade.
He saw an opportunity to get a guarantee that these guys were what they should be as opposed to what a bunch of players at the time *could be*. That's the key. At the time these prospects could all have been nothing.
Buerhle was very servicable for his time here and played a big role in the team for a veteran presence. I don't think that should be overlooked. Reyes ended up (with others) turning into Tulowitzki whom is/was considered one of the best SS in the game. All of these players may not have been anything last year for the Jays, some of the players we got were at least contributing to a playoff contending team. That we know.
AA saw an opportunity to go for the playoffs and took it. I respect him having the balls to roll those dice. I'd rather have a GM go for it than sit around going...we could have...but well...we're still middling because we chose the mystery box.
At the end of the day, I think it worked out alright for both teams. They got cost certainty and control, we got a team good enough to contend and a pretty damn fun playoff appearance.
He saw an opportunity to get a guarantee that these guys were what they should be as opposed to what a bunch of players at the time *could be*. That's the key. At the time these prospects could all have been nothing.
Buerhle was very servicable for his time here and played a big role in the team for a veteran presence. I don't think that should be overlooked. Reyes ended up (with others) turning into Tulowitzki whom is/was considered one of the best SS in the game. All of these players may not have been anything last year for the Jays, some of the players we got were at least contributing to a playoff contending team. That we know.
AA saw an opportunity to go for the playoffs and took it. I respect him having the balls to roll those dice. I'd rather have a GM go for it than sit around going...we could have...but well...we're still middling because we chose the mystery box.
At the end of the day, I think it worked out alright for both teams. They got cost certainty and control, we got a team good enough to contend and a pretty damn fun playoff appearance.
AA had people like LaCava, Tinnish, etc. under him that influenced moves as well; he wasn't doing everything by himself. Those people are all still in the organization, and they're still influential. Shapiro is not "equal" to AA; he's got about 4-5 high-ranking executives who are more than capable of handling day-to-day baseball operations without his input. He has to "OK" moves, but so did Beeston...that doesn't mean that he's running the team.
I partially agree with you. AA took a shot he opened our window in the immediate future but shortened the length of it that is just the reality of it. When you trade young cost controlled talent by the truck load for older "proven" talent it is for the short term gain and long term pain and there will be pain coming it is what it is we got an awesome 4 months last year but I was hoping that AA was building a more viable and long term contending team and that just isn't the route he went.
I don't think it is comparable at all. AA had autonomy. He left because he lost that autonomy under Shapiro.
Shapiro is the boss. He is the one that defines the fundamental values within which trades can be made. Beeston never had such a broad grasp and certainly did not micromanage.
I think Atkins is just Shapiro's tool.
The remaining core left with EE and Bautista gone is good enough for this team to middle out in my opinion. That's the problem we will be a middling team stuck with potentially two anchor contracts in Martin and Tulo. As for the prospects, some of them have been promising but none of them are good enough to truly be able to expect any long term value out of them yet, we are still a well below average farm with no real elite prospects.But that's not necessarily true though.
The Jays could contend this year which would be more awesome fun time. Then into the future you have Sanchez, Stroman, Pillar, Osuna, Travis, Smoak (if you want to keep him). They have lots of controlled phenomenal young talent already here. And that's not discussing guys like Donaldson (if they can lock him up) and Tulo (if he can stay relatively healthy).
Even unloading the farm they have tons of great talent young and old. They have Tellez, SRF, Alford to name a few...they only thing really missing is the up and coming catcher imo. Depends on what you think of Pentecost/Jiminez.
That doesn't even start to begin to think of what they could get for Donaldson if they decided to move a perennial top 3B if that time should come.
It remains that they have at least one top starter in Stroman, a young starter who is starting to look like what he was advertised as in Sanchez and a phenomenal bullpen arm (could be stretched out) in Osuna. You have your young pitching core already. You have your young inflielder and a solid CF option. The long term core is still there even if the "cupboard is bare".
If the Jays season starts to slouch, they can possibly refill that cupboard if Bautista/Edwin relinquish their no trade rights. Lots of good options going forward. It isn't as bleak as some make it out to be imo. And this is coming from a fan who really likes players with lots of control as well.
Is it perfect? No. But no team ever is.
(To be honest, it was just kinda fun to look up where all the players in that trade ended up)