BagHead
Registered User
How could we ever forget the guy that was drafted 1st overall? It's the guy drafted 2nd that nobody remembers.Those were the days......don't forget Daigle!
How could we ever forget the guy that was drafted 1st overall? It's the guy drafted 2nd that nobody remembers.Those were the days......don't forget Daigle!
I had a discussion about this with another member of this board recently. He's getting a lot more shots on net than he has historically, but is also scoring on a higher percentage of his shots. He does appear to have turned a bit of a corner offensively, but maybe not quite to the degree his current totals say. I would say that instead of 12 goals, he should probably be around 9 or 10.Guys? What in the dickens is going on with Hartman right now? Is this sustainable?
maybe he was always supposed to be a C in the league because it suits his style so well?I had a discussion about this with another member of this board recently. He's getting a lot more shots on net than he has historically, but is also scoring on a higher percentage of his shots. He does appear to have turned a bit of a corner offensively, but maybe not quite to the degree his current totals say. I would say that instead of 12 goals, he should probably be around 9 or 10.
He isn't a 40-50 goal scorer, but he does appear to be a 25-35 goal scorer if he continues playing the way he is right now. Short sample size, so I'm not sure if he will or not. We've seen him play like this for short bursts at times in his career, but I've never seen him string so many games of this caliber together before.
didnt he play with Kane his first or second year in the league? i believe in a recent interview he talked about it on a podcast with Russo or something.I don't know that Hartman has ever had this opportunity before. Seems to me that he was always in a bottom six grinder role.
didnt he play with Kane his first or second year in the league? i believe in a recent interview he talked about it on a podcast with Russo or something.
I thought I remembered him on Toews' wing in Chicago, at least occasionally. Might have been because Saad was out for a game or something though.I don't know that Hartman has ever had this opportunity before. Seems to me that he was always in a bottom six grinder role.
well there you go, i knew it was to an extent i just didnt know how much.The year they traded him is really the only time he saw some consitent minutes with Kane. Kane was his most common linemate that season, but he was only Kane's 4th most common.
I'd assume Addison gets sent down and they call up a depth-ier defenseman along with a forward. Would not surprise me if the forward is someone like Dewar instead of Boldy, but we shall see.So with Gaudreau out will Boldy get a call up?
2 topics I want to talk about.
1. Can Kaprizov break the single-season franchise point record. Additionally, how good is he if he’s got a legit center?
2. How much credit does Guerin get for this team’s success? If they make a fairytale-type run this year, are we still going to be able to argue that Guerin’s an idiot?
1: yes he can, if he had someone like Miller as his C he would be close to 100 points i believe. his creativity is showing again.2 topics I want to talk about.
1. Can Kaprizov break the single-season franchise point record. Additionally, how good is he if he’s got a legit center?
2. How much credit does Guerin get for this team’s success? If they make a fairytale-type run this year, are we still going to be able to argue that Guerin’s an idiot?
I get the idea that it’s not worth it to call up Boldy to play a checking role but we are currently in the position where we are playing our second best offensive player with AHLers. What gives? This is a no brainer.
2 topics I want to talk about.
1. Can Kaprizov break the single-season franchise point record. Additionally, how good is he if he’s got a legit center?
2. How much credit does Guerin get for this team’s success? If they make a fairytale-type run this year, are we still going to be able to argue that Guerin’s an idiot?
1.) Yes. For whatever reason I struggle to see Kaprizov eclipsing 100 points, but I can see him hitting 90. I guess it depends on what a "legit center" would be, but I'd assume that he'll always be the best player on his line unless something really crazy falls into our laps.2 topics I want to talk about.
1. Can Kaprizov break the single-season franchise point record. Additionally, how good is he if he’s got a legit center?
2. How much credit does Guerin get for this team’s success? If they make a fairytale-type run this year, are we still going to be able to argue that Guerin’s an idiot?
1.) Yes. For whatever reason I struggle to see Kaprizov eclipsing 100 points, but I can see him hitting 90. I guess it depends on what a "legit center" would be, but I'd assume that he'll always be the best player on his line unless something really crazy falls into our laps.
2.) Personally I'll give him plenty of credit for it, because I'd damn sure rag on him if they sucked. Of course it's only December and there's still plenty of time for them to suck, but there doesn't seem to be any serious risk of that right now.
It's weird because Guerin's biggest moves so far have either been subtractions or moves he didn't make, but if you can do that and still come out with a winning team it's fair to credit him for his restraint and eye for the bigger picture. The current team hasn't been built so much as assembled, but it's been assembled while building a strong prospect pool underneath it. That's a hard thing to pull off.
My main concern with him right now is really about opportunity costs. We're going into 3 years of cap deadzone, which also correspond to the team's best player's prime years, which is a big problem. If this team keeps on like it has he's going to have to make a real choice about whether or not to burn some assets on a rental center to try for one last hurrah before the cold settles in, or just keep letting it ride with the group he's got.
I'm not sure there are enough honeyed words in the English language to convince a decent UFA to "go for it" on a team with $10m+ in dead cap space. They could do the same thing with any number of teams that don't have that handicap.theres always a chance he sweet talks a veteran ufa that still has some juice to sign for a year here at minimal cost to try to "go for it"
I'm not sure there are enough honeyed words in the English language to convince a decent UFA to "go for it" on a team with $10m+ in dead cap space. They could do the same thing with any number of teams that don't have that handicap.
Are we talking about signing a UFA in-season this year? I assumed we were talking about signing someone over the summer. They've been very good this year but it's been on the back of team depth that's going to get kicked in the knees this summer. Any UFA would not be committing to the same team that's having success right now.ya, but have those teams done what we have so far this season without a center? thats the selling point.
Are we talking about signing a UFA in-season this year? I assumed we were talking about signing someone over the summer. They've been very good this year but it's been on the back of team depth that's going to get kicked in the knees this summer. Any UFA would not be committing to the same team that's having success right now.
I guess we'll see. I could see Bjugstad back on a similar deal and maybe Sturm pulls a Hartman to stick around. We'll still be relying on Addison, Boldy and Rossi to step into substantial roles all at once next year, though. It'd be a really weird team to pick to go Cup hunting with, but who knows.no i meant over the summer. the team will lose a couple pieces but by and large would be the same it is now.