Could you elaborate into actual quantifiable terms to prove your point?More dynamic. They are similar calibers but Gaudreau is slightly better.
Could you elaborate into actual quantifiable terms to prove your point?More dynamic. They are similar calibers but Gaudreau is slightly better.
Here no, because posting stats is extremely off topic from the thread. If you want to make a thread to discuss how good Kaprizov is sureCould you elaborate into actual quantifiable terms to prove your point?
That's what I thought. Not surprised from the same guy who posted this within the last week:Here no, because posting stats is extremely off topic from the thread. If you want to make a thread to discuss how good Kaprizov is sure
You say that like Fiala is a much better player than Mangiapane.
Lol you're a troll. None of what I said there or here is incorrect. What's your argument for Fiala being much better? his points? Then I guess there is no question Gaudreau is much better than Kaprizov right?That's what I thought. Not surprised from the same guy who posted this within the last week:
Either clearly have an infatuation with Calgary players or a strong dislike of Minnesota players. Coin toss either way.
Fiala outscored Mangiapane by 30 points and you implied they are similar level players. Kaprizov had 2 less points than Draisaitl, yet I'm the troll here for suggesting they are in the same tier?Lol you're a troll. None of what I said there or here is incorrect. What's your argument for Fiala being much better? his points? Then I guess there is no question Gaudreau is much better than Kaprizov right?
Dahlin.@Digitalbooya and @Ledge And Dairy
Could you settle the debate about, who is better:
Quinn Hughes or Rasmus Dahlin?
Ah yes so all you know how to do is count points. That's the end of that discussion, have a nice dayFiala outscored Mangiapane by 30 points and you implied they are similar level players. Kaprizov had 2 less points than Draisaitl, yet I'm the troll here for suggesting they are in the same tier?
ES:
Kaprizov 81GP 33G 44A 77PTS 15:46 ES TOI
Draisaitl 80GP 30G 38A 68PTS 17:34 ES TOI
Even strength Kaprizov outproduces Draisaitl while also playing almost 2 minutes less of even strength hockey per game.
You have no argument. Certainly you're not gonna sit here and imply that Draisaitl is better at defense? What is so awful about me saying these players are the same tier:Ah yes so all you know how to do is count points. That's the end of that discussion, have a nice day
YesCan you name an attribute that Draisaitl is better at? Skating? Shot? Passing? Vision?
Anything?
Ouf, not every pass becomes an assist pal. Please keep telling us how your biased opinion is worth more than the +500 NHL players that were polled this year.Best passer in the league, but somehow didn't have more assists than Kaprizov?
Oh so this is how it's going to be?
i knew i was missing someone familiarBetter to be slighted than ignored?
The 500 players put McDavid behind Backstrom in terms of passing. That’s absurd.Ouf, not every pass becomes an assist pal. Please keep telling us how your biased opinion is worth more than the +500 NHL players that were polled this year.
Patiently waiting.
He is? I don’t know about that. Hughes has a super high ceiling. And his progress from his rookie season to year 2 was impressive.Kaprizov is the better player though...
Everyone's entitled to their opinion. The fact of the matter is, yours is in the minority.The 500 players put McDavid behind Backstrom in terms of passing. That’s absurd.
They put a washed MAF as a top 3 goalie if you had to win one game.
But go on about how their opinion is so great.
It's such a dumb way of "proving" the point. I guess, by the same logic, MAF is better than Shesterkin, Saros, Kuemper, Sorokin, Demko, Oettinger, etc. If you say otherwise then you're entitled to your opinion... But the fact of the matter is, your's is in the minority.Everyone's entitled to their opinion. The fact of the matter is, yours is in the minority.
Wait until you see what Kaprizov did from year 1 to year 2.He is? I don’t know about that. Hughes has a super high ceiling. And his progress from his rookie season to year 2 was impressive.
Wait until you see what Kaprizov did from year 1 to year 2.
what really is funny for me, is that the posters, which i remember as minnesota fans on the mainboard aren't posting here.
seems like we discuss here with the kaprizov fanboys.
You have to look at the criteria of the question and the poll. It likely took months to acquire this data, when is it you think they polled the 500+ players? Oettinger hadn't played a full season yet.. some of these goalies like Shesterkin hadn't even played a playoff game yet. For 1 Game, do or die, would choose a goalie with limited to no experience or a 3 time SC champion months removed from a Vezina. These 500+ players regularly get to see these skill sets live and up close, it's a great way to prove a point.It's such a dumb way of "proving" the point. I guess, by the same logic, MAF is better than Shesterkin, Saros, Kuemper, Sorokin, Demko, Oettinger, etc. If you say otherwise then you're entitled to your opinion... But the fact of the matter is, your's is in the minority.
Good? Because Kaprizov isn't being offered......it's Fiala.Kaprizov wasn’t even a ppg in the KHL when he was Hughes age.
Yes, Kaprizov is better right now, but looking at Hughes’ trajectory, it’s not outlandish to think he’ll be as good or maybe even better than Kaprizov when all is said and done. Given their ages and contracts too…the Devils would certainly pass.
Good? Because Kaprizov isn't being offered......it's Fiala.
And who gives a f' about the KHL or ppg when 49 games is the sample? Previous pace has no bearing on actual trajectory, it's just a hopeful data point......Hughes will need to turn it into actual production including get lucky, stay healthy, not become a PITA, etc. Again, wonderful player but pump the brakes before comparing him to a guy that has a 100pt season on the resume' already.