viper0220
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2008
- 8,648
- 3,579
marner is better but I might rather have Rantanen depending on his contract
Marner is better 5v5 and on the PK, Rantanen is better on the PPI have to respectfully disagree with you here, Mikko Rantanen can do it all, big wingers like Mikko Rantanen are very rare. Marner is no slouch either.
Marner is better 5v5 and on the PK, Rantanen is better on the PP
Rantanen is the better player. More proven, bigger, and better defensively in my opinion. They both play with all star line mates, so that kinda cancels out here.
He’ll probably get overpaid now tho thanks to Marner/Matthews
Now the bar for good defense is simply being put on the PK?Rantanen plays on the PK?
It is hard for Marner to prove how good he is without the puck (outside of killing penalties) because he seems to always have the puck when he's on the ice
Rantanen is the better player. More proven, bigger, and better defensively in my opinion. They both play with all star line mates, so that kinda cancels out here.
He’ll probably get overpaid now tho thanks to Marner/Matthews
Now the bar for good defense is simply being put on the PK?
Guess that explains why Matthews is weak defensively
He literally did the last 2 seasonsDoesn't outproduce him, so how is he better?