Post-Game Talk: Mike Smith beats Hutch. Oilers win 3-2
- Thread starter Stephen
- Start date
I agree with you, I don't think the Leafs should be viewed as heavy favourites against the Oilers, or Winnipeg either for that matter.
I was just trying to point out that valid reasons were given as why some might find the standings misleading in this case, which you appeared to dismiss and just repeat that the standings were close. But when I pointed at the standings for why the Leafs shouldn't have been viewed as favourites over the Blue Jackets you dimissed that too. I am happy to move on though.
If a series against the Oilers started tomorrow though, I would like the Leafs chances better against them then I did going into the Columbus series last year.
Per Bodog:
Cup:
Leafs: +650, Tied with Colorado for 2nd best behind Tampa at +550, Vegas close behind the Leafs and Avs at +700.
Oilers: +1700
I think that's generous to the Leafs.
Yeah, I saw that. Good news, I guess he'll go back to marlies for a bit.
I was responding to someone who said he should be in there, may he didn't know that Robertson was hurt.
Dubas, did something, you just don't do. Recently. He said we need a top seven forward, which by itself, is one the dumbest statements, ever, by a GM, in the NHL.
He is young, less than forty. No GM weill ever take him seriously after he stated that. It was the dumbest, bleat, by a GM in NHL history.
Worst bluff in NHL GM history.
Douche move. Makes me think he is related to Harold.
Great game tonight, both teams going full out.
But we have no goalies.
Get a goalie dumbass and don't embarass yourself, or your fellow GM's that you want a top seven
forward.
My best friend growing up, Gord Stellick was quite smarter than this guy. He just worked under tyrants and worse.
Dubas has the world behind him, and he says to the NHL, he needs a top seven forward.
No he doesn't, he needs goalies. He didnt fool anyone. And overnight, he is laughed at, throughout the NHl for creating a bad bluff.
Who the heck calls any player a top seven anyways?
He is young, less than forty. No GM weill ever take him seriously after he stated that. It was the dumbest, bleat, by a GM in NHL history.
Worst bluff in NHL GM history.
Douche move. Makes me think he is related to Harold.
Great game tonight, both teams going full out.
But we have no goalies.
Get a goalie dumbass and don't embarass yourself, or your fellow GM's that you want a top seven
forward.
My best friend growing up, Gord Stellick was quite smarter than this guy. He just worked under tyrants and worse.
Dubas has the world behind him, and he says to the NHL, he needs a top seven forward.
No he doesn't, he needs goalies. He didnt fool anyone. And overnight, he is laughed at, throughout the NHl for creating a bad bluff.
Who the heck calls any player a top seven anyways?
pucksakes666
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2018
- 661
- 289
Do you really think GMs believe what other GMs say in public?
Matthews looked awful on the backcheck in OT. Lazy, instead of skating he tried to hold on to McDavid. Should've turned around and hustled his ass on the back check to take Nurse. Rielly played the 2 on 1 terribly too, I don't fault Hutch on that or any goal tbh. A breakaway, deflection in front, and a 2 on 1 which was essentially a 2 on 0 the way Rielly/Matthews played it.
Same story, dominate the other team, can't convert, other team gets 2-3 chances all game and convert on all of them. We need to start burying our chances, hitting too many posts and getting robbed or maybe misplacing shots. Loved the effort all game from everyone, thought we played a complete game, just didn't convert.
Same story, dominate the other team, can't convert, other team gets 2-3 chances all game and convert on all of them. We need to start burying our chances, hitting too many posts and getting robbed or maybe misplacing shots. Loved the effort all game from everyone, thought we played a complete game, just didn't convert.
We're just not converting on our chances. We didn't lose because of Hutch, we lost because of Smith. I don't know how Hutch really had a chance on any of those. He's not an elite goalie we know that, at best he's a backup and did a fine job as a backup. He made the saves he needed to, we had plenty of chances to bury them tonight, just couldn't convert. That's been our biggest issue. Our shooters need to find ways to make the most of our opportunities. We're generating a shit ton.
NO goalie, no fun. No tickie, no laundry.
The Leafs played hard tonight, real hard. It was like a playoff game.
But a guy we essentially ran out of town, was our goalie tonight.
Billion dollar franchise? And this goalie is all we can procur?
Gotta say, its almost funny. Till you look at the win and loss column.
Dubas, I want your job.
Maybe you have been given a mandate, just make the Leafs adorable, and competitive
If so, you are doing a really good job. Great job.
If you have been told give us a champ, you are a chimp.
The Leafs played hard tonight, real hard. It was like a playoff game.
But a guy we essentially ran out of town, was our goalie tonight.
Billion dollar franchise? And this goalie is all we can procur?
Gotta say, its almost funny. Till you look at the win and loss column.
Dubas, I want your job.
Maybe you have been given a mandate, just make the Leafs adorable, and competitive
If so, you are doing a really good job. Great job.
If you have been told give us a champ, you are a chimp.
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
Mickey Marner
Registered User
Season series with the Oilers now complete, here are the stats.
I think the Oilers would be a rather favourable playoff matchup, much more so than Winnipeg and arguably Montreal as well.
- PTS: 14
- PTS conceded: 7
- GF: 31
- GA: 19
- TOI & CF% leading: 247:44, 42.07%
- TOI & CF% tied: 208:31, 51.90%
- TOI & CF% trailing: 88:38, 62.09%
- PP: 9/23, 39.10%
- PK: 4/20, 80.00%
- SH%: 12.06%
- SV%: 92.28%
- Scored first: 5 times
I think the Oilers would be a rather favourable playoff matchup, much more so than Winnipeg and arguably Montreal as well.
It was kinda, big time douche. I didn't like it. I am sure many here didn't either. We are presenting a guy we ditched, against a team battling us for first place.
To Hutchinson, he gave it, he battled. Didn't emberass himself. Only one who should be soiled is Dubas.
We have NO goaltending now. We never did. For two years.
Our team must be exhausted carrying ECHL goalies. I know I would.
To Hutchinson, he gave it, he battled. Didn't emberass himself. Only one who should be soiled is Dubas.
We have NO goaltending now. We never did. For two years.
Our team must be exhausted carrying ECHL goalies. I know I would.
Cecithepylon
Registered User
- May 4, 2017
- 1,780
- 1,397
Would you mind posting a link for this, thx. I saw where he said he'd be willing to move a top prospect or draft pick for a quality forward, but a quick Google didn't send me in the right direction. Cheers.
SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,775
OVO16
#WeTheNorth
- Apr 16, 2017
- 9,979
- 9,652
RealisticLeaf55
Win it clean for J.T
What the f*** did I just read.
OVO16
#WeTheNorth
- Apr 16, 2017
- 9,979
- 9,652
He's looked off a bit since coming back from the injury. Lets stop judging players off a few games.
He was a beast before he got hurt. And Im sure he's gonna pay massive dividends in the playoffs. Cant wait for Playoff Simmonds
I think people need to lay off Hutch. The guy is a 3rd stringer for a reason. He kept us in this game and didn't allow anything crazy to put us out of striking distance. You win some, you lose some. Overall, great effort by the boys. I really hope we can maybe see a game from Veini. I want to see what this kid looks like in net. Maybe we have some value there.
RealisticLeaf55
Win it clean for J.T
I'm really not upset over this loss. Just another easy point against the loilers.
We need a trade to shake things up. Need more depth at scoring and priority of a penalty killer/ defenseman. Do we go for a goalie?
We need a trade to shake things up. Need more depth at scoring and priority of a penalty killer/ defenseman. Do we go for a goalie?
hobarth
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 1,160
- 294
I think we're very lucky TO played Edmonton basically in the 1st 1/2 of the season.
PP sucks, major time, what was that 19 PP opportunities o goals.
Offence sucks, 2 goals seems to becoming the norm, 40 mil. on 4 players and they can only muster barely over 2 goals per game over 10 games when it counts.
Goaltending could be better but no goaltender should be expected to win when the team only scores so little per game.
What happened to that team from the 1st period, total domination, then they let up, Hutch was the hero tonite, Hutch?
Every goalie TO plays looks like a Vezina candidate, coincidence, bad luck, goaltending/defense might be TO's greatest strength, forwards that can score is needed, forwards with enough stamina to play an entire game would also help.
This is the same team that was limping to the end of the season last year, had TO played an entire season it was very likely TO might not have made the playoffs.
Marner played 21:45, Matthews 22:16, Hy 22:19 meanwhile JT 16 mins, Ny 15 min., are the best players playing too much, are the other quality players playing too little, it's certainly rare to play forwards more than the top pairing d-men. I think in a year like this with the condensed schedule overplaying forwards to this extent has a price.
One of the things I've liked about Keefe is his willingness to mix things up when things aren't clicking either game to game and even within a game but I wonder with such a long dry spell why isn't he trying something different with the PP?
PP sucks, major time, what was that 19 PP opportunities o goals.
Offence sucks, 2 goals seems to becoming the norm, 40 mil. on 4 players and they can only muster barely over 2 goals per game over 10 games when it counts.
Goaltending could be better but no goaltender should be expected to win when the team only scores so little per game.
What happened to that team from the 1st period, total domination, then they let up, Hutch was the hero tonite, Hutch?
Every goalie TO plays looks like a Vezina candidate, coincidence, bad luck, goaltending/defense might be TO's greatest strength, forwards that can score is needed, forwards with enough stamina to play an entire game would also help.
This is the same team that was limping to the end of the season last year, had TO played an entire season it was very likely TO might not have made the playoffs.
Marner played 21:45, Matthews 22:16, Hy 22:19 meanwhile JT 16 mins, Ny 15 min., are the best players playing too much, are the other quality players playing too little, it's certainly rare to play forwards more than the top pairing d-men. I think in a year like this with the condensed schedule overplaying forwards to this extent has a price.
One of the things I've liked about Keefe is his willingness to mix things up when things aren't clicking either game to game and even within a game but I wonder with such a long dry spell why isn't he trying something different with the PP?
