OpRedDawn*
Guest
Coyle earned the 1st line spot by his play in Houston.
hahahahhahah
no
Coyle earned the 1st line spot by his play in Houston.
Coyle earned the 1st line spot by his play in Houston.
Mikaels thoughts referred (Finnish media):
- Of course it feels bad, but the best players get to play.
- When you think about it, maybe its better to get a lot of icetime and hockey feel in the AHL, than to sit in the stands in Minnesota.
- In my opinion, the last games i got to play, i was playing better. Unfortunately, everyone else was playing even better than that.
- Nobody doesn't want to go to AHL, but to be honest, i need some minutes now. That what the coach and GM said; they'll rather see me playing in AHL than sitting in the stands.
Don't agree with Mikael there.
Don't agree with Mikael there.
lol like the GM of Calgary has any room to talk about anything with success right now. Being on the ice in Houston is going to only help MiG and I am really glad to see he has the right attitude about it and isn't pulling a Pouliot.
Coyle earned the 1st line spot by his play in Houston.
He's more a victim of the situation right now than anything, which is not much of a stain on him or the team, it just is what it is.
coyle "earned" his spot by virtue of being a big strong winger.
This is exactly what I ment. Coyle dominated the ice with his physical play in AHL. Granlund was good on the PP only, and even there he could have produced more with the wingers he had (Coyle and Zucker). Granlund has a lot to learn of the 5 on 5 game in AHL.
Of course they could just give up on the hope of him ever becoming the 2nd line center and just move him to wing. But I think bringing him in as a center and keeping him there is the best thing that can happen to Granlund.
Don't agree with any of that...
Why not?
What did you see in the AHL that leads you to believe Granlund was dominant 5 on 5 in the AHL?
If people believe that a PPG=dominant, then I simply disagree with your definition of dominant.
Not to beat a dead horse but Granlund had some of the same problems in the AHL that he did in the NHL. He had a hard time cycling, he did not move his feet, he backchecked some games, and he was not in good position 5 on 5. He was deadly on the half-wall on the PP and on odd-man rushes.
I am not saying he is a horrible player at all. I just don't agree with anyone that asserts a player cannot improve playing in the AHL.
I actually do think Granlund generally played very well in the AHL. He was a constant threat in the offensive zone, imo even 5 on 5, with a good shot, good- to great play making and he still surprised many in the way that he took responsibility in the defense. Much more impressed with him than with Zucker and Coyle for as long as they all played together. Wished that Yeo would have given him more confidence and kept him as a wing in the top 6.
AHL is great for Larsson who gets to build confidence in his offensive abilities, for Phillips who can adopt to a speedier game, even for Coyle and Zucker if the team hadn't needed them. But I'm not a fan of the seemingly erratic handling of Granlund, hopefully at least that ends now.
I respect your opinion. How many games did you see?
I thought that Zucker was easily the more "dominant" player while in the AHL together. I thought Coyle was the best at cycling and understanding of NHL positioning. We will just have to agree to disagree on our viewings of Granlund.
Not sure I am reading your last paragraph correctly. If you are asserting that Granlund is more NHL ready than Zucker or Coyle with this team at this team, I disagree. As for Larsson and Phillips, Larsson had played great the past two weeks. I believe he would be better in a bottom 6 role than Granlund due his board play and better defensive awareness. Phillips is a long way off.
In short, I still have a lot of faith in Granlund because of his intelligence, hands, and vision. I don't think him being sent down right now is going to have a negative effect on his development.
Well, if that wasn't meant to discredit me, the honest answer is that I saw all Aeros games with Granlund and then most without him, although none live. We'll just have to agree to disagree. Imo Zucker wasn't dominant until about when Granlund got hurt.
Based on their AHL performance I definitely think Granlund was most NHL ready. He got scared by the situation though and underperformed. Coyle, and especially Zucker did the opposite. So if performing good from the start means they were more NHL ready, than yes. Otherwise no, I still see more skill in Granlund than I do in C&Z.