So we are a halfway through the season and how do you see the players, coaches, goalies, the team?
ForwardsHoward - C
Goalies
Man I really like Howard, I always have. This season was looking really good for howie, and then the epic collapse of his playing happened and now I'd rather have Darren Elliot in goal.
Howard is a lot like Manny Legace, he's got a lot of talent, but he is such a headcase that he can lose all that talent at the drop of a hat.
Is that why his save percentage is historically one of the most consistent in the league?
Howard is a lot like Manny Legace, he's got a lot of talent, but he is such a headcase that he can lose all that talent at the drop of a hat.
Larkin - A-
What can I say other than wow. I knew Larkin had elite talent and speed but man this kid can just connect the dots in a way that makes you think hes 26 with a few seasons already under his belt at the NHL level. Once he can mold his game into something he is able to bring 82/82 games he will be one of the biggest threats the Red Wings have had in a while.
Larkin - A
Zetterberg - B
Datsyuk - A
Gator - A
Nyquist - C
Tatar - B
Ericsson -
Green - B
Kronwall - F
DD - C
Smith - C
Mrazek - A
Howard - D
Sheahan - C
Richards - C
Quincey - NA
Helm - C
Marchenko - B
Blashill - C
Hasn't moved the needle one way or the other.
Don't really care to grade the rest.
As in...hasn't moved the needle beyond what Babcock did? If thats the case (and I completely agree), then he deserves a hell of a lot more than a C. You just said, in fewer words, that Blashill has performed comparably to the NHL's most respected and revered NHL coach.
Larkin has exceeded literally 100% of everybody's expectations in the world. Giving Larkin an A- is like giving a 10 year-old an A- in a college-level course where he scores 99%.
Ehh, i think Babcock's game plan was pretty vanilla. Obviously Babcock is an excellent coach, but the roster he had to work with didn't really leave much room for experimentation.
A great coach isn't going to get much more out of a mediocre roster over a bad coach. Not that i'm insinuating Blashill is a bad coach.
Also i think coaching isn't super important during the regular season. I think a playoff series would do a better job of gauging Blashill's performance.
This thread is grading players performance up to the midway point, not on performance vs expectations. An A+ in my eyes is a grade you give when somebody is playing 110% in each aspect of their game. I don't think Larkin has hit that level yet. He is performing beyond expectations yes, but to say he is a truley elite player right now is jumping the gun a little. His ability to protect himself and the puck is based on his speed. Take a look at a player like Zetterberg. He doesn't have the legs to skate around every player anymore but he might possibly be the best player in the league at protecting the puck with one hand on his stick. That's something I want larkin to pick up.
Coaching isn't important in 82 games of the regular season? Are you suggesting that the players just randomly do whatever they want in the regular season but somehow need direction in the playoffs? I am curious what you think the head coach's job is?
You play a different team almost every other day. There isn't much game planning that can take place in such a short amount of time. Playoffs allow the coaching staff to focus on one team and have 82 games worth of data to dissect.
Although it doesn't matter if the coach doesn't have the talent to win. Good coach or bad coach, they will lose.
Larkins gotta be an A+ so far.
What more could we have hoped for?