Last year he had 1.22PPG. He is only 21. You would expect an upward PPG....his year 2 is 0.15+ more than his year 1....so maybe we could expect around 1.35 this season. But he is only at 1.13. Disappointing?
He got injured and scoring went down in 07-08.In Crosby's 2nd year he got 120 points in 79 games. = 1.52
In his 3rd year he got 72 points in 53 games. =1.36
I never looked at him the same since that disappointing drop....
You're basing your assessment of the player on the progression of his ppg over less than three years?Last year he had 1.22PPG. He is only 21. You would expect an upward PPG....his year 2 is 0.15+ more than his year 1....so maybe we could expect around 1.35 this season. But he is only at 1.13. Disappointing?
He got injured and scoring went down in 07-08.
Scoring this year is actually higher than 06-07, yet McDavid's production is down as well. I'm sure McDavid will be fine though, he'll still likely be a top 40 player ever
I thought pps were up this year too but mcdavid isn't really benefiting as much with the oilers being awful on special teamsNHL League Averages | Hockey-Reference.com
No it's not. As of right now exactly 2.95 gpg and in 06/07 as well. But 06/07 had a lot more pp so the stars in 06/07 point totals should be higher.
Your aware something like 70% of the nhl are first round picks eh.you mean either 4th overall Poolparty or 3rd overall Draisaitl on his wing, and 7th overall Nurse, 19th overall Klefbom or 4th overall Larsson feeding him the puck?
Poor guy!
NHL League Averages | Hockey-Reference.com
No it's not. As of right now exactly 2.95 gpg and in 06/07 as well. But 06/07 had a lot more pp so the stars in 06/07 point totals should be higher.
Your aware something like 70% of the nhl are first round picks eh.
What's the graph about?... girlfriends per week? Whatever it is... sure looks like McDavid sucks at it.
Hockey reference is incorrect as they include shootout goals in their calculations. The GPG average right now is 5.80, compared to 5.75 in 07, iirc.NHL League Averages | Hockey-Reference.com
No it's not. As of right now exactly 2.95 gpg and in 06/07 as well. But 06/07 had a lot more pp so the stars in 06/07 point totals should be higher.
Yeah I really didn't feel like labelling it, its easy enough to interpret. It's not meant to suggest McDavid isn't as good as those players, simply to show the fluctuations in PPG through the career of an elite player. I could have put more work into and got the season adjusted numbers, I should have excluded McDavid all together because @illpucks is just going to completely miss the point, my bad.