wins and losses are a way way tinier sample size than saves and shots.
just because you SAY that is it doesn't make it true, I know you think that because you say it, it is true but that's not how things work
Yes it is. Do you *really* think Babcock cares about McElhinney's sv% in his two games a month? No. He cares about McElhinney winning. How that result is achieved doesnt matter. Weve talked before about Enroth. Enroth couldnt win and was moved. McElhinney wins more then he loses and thats all that matters.
Furthering my point, Jamie McLennan, a journeyman backup goalie most of his career, has stated this how he judges backups and how he was judged when he played.
I'd be interested in seeing this.I did a post earlier in the year showing that McBackup’s numbers over the past 4-5 seasons shows he’s a high end backup.
If the search function worked at all on the new boards, I’d repost it
Would you really? Because one is doing his job, but is let down by his team. The other is not doing his job, but is saved by his team. We are not acquiring the team in this instance, we are acquiring someone to do his job.let's do it this way.
if you had to choose between a backup goalie that let ins 2 goals or less, but had 0 wins and a backup goalie who let in 4 goals again but had 6 wins, which goalie would you want?
answer. the one who let in 4 goals a game, but had 6 wins.
You're correct, just win is all that he's asked to do.Yes it is. Do you *really* think Babcock cares about McElhinney's sv% in his two games a month? No. He cares about McElhinney winning. How that result is achieved doesnt matter. Weve talked before about Enroth. Enroth couldnt win and was moved. McElhinney wins more then he loses and thats all that matters.
Furthering my point, Jamie McLennan, a journeyman backup goalie most of his career and current NHL analyst, has stated this is how he judges backups and how he was judged when he played.
Well so what?
A goalie can win a game while allowing 5 goals.
Backup goalies get thrown into bad situations. Theyre disposable. If he can win more games then he loses but has a terrible sv% why does it matter?
Well so what?
A goalie can win a game while allowing 5 goals.
Backup goalies get thrown into bad situations. Theyre disposable. If he can win more games then he loses but has a terrible sv% why does it matter?
McElhinney
.906 career
.910 last 5yrs
.919 last 2yrs
.925 this year
and he's not even being used in traditional "sheltered" matchups - he just gets the backends of back to backs no matter who the opponent is (and always has a tired team in front of him).
let's do it this way.
if you had to choose between a backup goalie that let ins 2 goals or less, but had 0 wins and a backup goalie who let in 4 goals again but had 6 wins, which goalie would you want?
answer. the one who let in 4 goals a game, but had 6 wins.
I'd be interested in seeing this.
In the past 4 seasons, McBackup has made 2,442 saves. He's allowed 243 goals. That is 2,685 shots against.
AKA a sv% of .910 Last season, that would have ranked T-42nd among NHL goalies. In fact, McBackup finished 26th among goalies last season.
McBackup, for the past half decade, has been one of the most consistent and reliable backups in the league, who, as Babcock says "knows his role, and does it well" and we have him signed for less than 900K.
I'll take that over a 2.5M goalie who had a nice hot streak
Did some digging and found it. It was just before the season, in response to people wishing we had signed Mike Condon to an expensive deal. McBackup now has a .925 sv% and a 2.44 GAA this season.
wouldn't that depend on how they lost?If the Leafs had lost last night, Babcock wouldn't have blamed Mac one little bit.
wouldn't that depend on how they lost?
it takes 16 wins to hoist the cup, doesn't care how you get itWould you really? Because one is doing his job, but is let down by his team. The other is not doing his job, but is saved by his team. We are not acquiring the team in this instance, we are acquiring someone to do his job.
I don't get judging a player on team performance when the player's own performance is right there.
Would you really? Because one is doing his job, but is let down by his team. The other is not doing his job, but is saved by his team. We are not acquiring the team in this instance, we are acquiring someone to do his job.
I don't get judging a player on team performance when the player's own performance is right there.
Would you really? Because one is doing his job, but is let down by his team. The other is not doing his job, but is saved by his team. We are not acquiring the team in this instance, we are acquiring someone to do his job.
I don't get judging a player on team performance when the player's own performance is right there.
one is winning, one is not. that's how the backup position is judged. i mean. at the end of the day that's what's important for the backup goalie. did you win? yes - okay did ya not, okay why not?
Yes I totally agree - the bottom line is "W", regardless of how you get (doesn't matter what your stats are)
the amount of backtobacks we have is the amount of games mcelhinney will playWe're only going to get to see more of McBackup this year.
If we're sitting pretty like we are currently in the later months, there's no doubt Babcock will be playing him more often. Thinking we will see Andersen play 63-65 games if we continue to hold our placement in the standings.
Well so what?
A goalie can win a game while allowing 5 goals.
Backup goalies get thrown into bad situations. Theyre disposable. If he can win more games then he loses but has a terrible sv% why does it matter?