koyvoo
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2014
- 17,268
- 17,051
Matthews for my fantasy team, Gilmour to go to war with.
/threadMatthews for my fantasy team, Gilmour to go to war with.
/thread
I'd take Matthews right up until game one of the postseason. Then I take Gilmour.
Thought this would be a runaway for Gilmour. I’d take him in a heartbeat.
He's not even the best Leaf on his own teamMatthews is a Stanley cup away from being the greatest Leaf of all time.
He's got the rockets, the Hart, the Ted Lindsay, the rookie of the year, he's got everything he needs except a championship.
He wins a championship he's the best Leaf of all time
I mean, looking at all of this and OP's info.Some other notable top 10 finishes:
Goals
Matthews: 1, 1, 2, 3Gilmour: 10
Goals/Game
Matthews: 1, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7Gilmour:Assists
Matthews:Gilmour: 2, 2, 5, 6, 8
Assists/Game
Matthews:Gilmour: 3, 3, 10, 10, 10
Points
Matthews: 5, 6 ,9Gilmour: 4, 5, 7
Points/Game
Matthews: 3, 6Gilmour: 5, 9, 9
Comparing a career 7 years in to a finished 20 year career is not exactly fair, but IMO Matthews already has a more impressive career and will add more to it. I would take Matthews pretty easily.
But he’s never made it past the 2nd round and only made it past the first once. And it’s not like they’ve lost despite his play. He simply hadn’t gotten it done.Matthews is a Stanley cup away from being the greatest Leaf of all time.
He's got the rockets, the Hart, the Ted Lindsay, the rookie of the year, he's got everything he needs except a championship.
He wins a championship he's the best Leaf of all time
But he’s never made it past the 2nd round and only made it past the first once. And it’s not like they’ve lost despite his play. He simply hadn’t gotten it done.
Gilmour was a beast. Incredible in the cup win with Calgary. A couple of great runs with Toronto. Played his best when it mattered. Just a great, great player.
So during this "making it passed the first round" Matthews was 3rd in team scoring. In both playoffs and regular season. He wasn't even the best player on his own team.It Ovechkin 14 years to win.
It took Yzerman 13 years.
It took Tampa's current core 12 years which included getting swept by Columbus after a 62 win season, and literally getting laughed out of the building at the 2019 NHL awards.
People forget that but it happened.
Matthews is 25, sometimes it takes awhile.
They broke their 1st round drought, maybe that's what it took.
Maybe not we shall see.
It's not over yet.
I get that. I do.It Ovechkin 14 years to win.
It took Yzerman 13 years.
It took Tampa's current core 12 years which included getting swept by Columbus after a 62 win season, and literally getting laughed out of the building at the 2019 NHL awards.
People forget that but it happened.
Matthews is 25, sometimes it takes awhile.
They broke their 1st round drought, maybe that's what it took.
Maybe not we shall see.
It's not over yet.
I wouldn't./thread
I'd take Matthews right up until game one of the postseason. Then I take Gilmour.
Matthews is a Stanley cup away from being the greatest Leaf of all time.
He's got the rockets, the Hart, the Ted Lindsay, the rookie of the year, he's got everything he needs except a championship.
He wins a championship he's the best Leaf of all time
All time = All Time......it's not that far fetched. If Matthews brings the cup to Toronto in heroic fashion (he can't just be a passenger....he'll need to be the leader....which is a stretch to begin with) it's not a hard argument that he gets to greatest Leaf of all-time. The stretch is what needs to happen in the playoffs actually happening. In terms of all times goals and points lists, he should have no problem getting to the top of that eventually if he's healthy enough and stays with the team.....Marner seems to be the challenger right now for points.All time = post 1990?
Matthews will be 26 this week. Ovechkin, Yzerman and Tampa’s core all had more playoff success before they won the Cup.It Ovechkin 14 years to win.
It took Yzerman 13 years.
It took Tampa's current core 12 years which included getting swept by Columbus after a 62 win season, and literally getting laughed out of the building at the 2019 NHL awards.
People forget that but it happened.
Matthews is 25, sometimes it takes awhile.
They broke their 1st round drought, maybe that's what it took.
Maybe not we shall see.
It's not over yet.
Outside of his run in 2018, Ovi has had a pretty underwhelming playoff career. Ovi only has 2 great playoff runs in my eyes, 2009 and 2018. Ovi has never made it past the 2nd round except for in 2018, so I wouldn't really agree that he had more success than Matthews before 2018.Matthews will be 26 this week. Ovechkin, Yzerman and Tampa’s core all had more playoff success before they won the Cup.
Matthews still has a lot more to prove in the playoffs than the players you listed.
Like you said, all it takes is one great year but until it happens it’s a fair criticism imo.
Matthews will be 26 this week. Ovechkin, Yzerman and Tampa’s core all had more playoff success before they won the Cup.
Matthews still has a lot more to prove in the playoffs than the players you listed.
Like you said, all it takes is one great year but until it happens it’s a fair criticism imo.
Very true, the leafs window opens up again imo in 2 yrs when taveras caphit comes off the books.It Ovechkin 14 years to win.
It took Yzerman 13 years.
It took Tampa's current core 12 years which included getting swept by Columbus after a 62 win season, and literally getting laughed out of the building at the 2019 NHL awards.
People forget that but it happened.
Matthews is 25, sometimes it takes awhile.
They broke their 1st round drought, maybe that's what it took.
Maybe not we shall see.
It's not over yet.