Speculation: Matt Murray to Chicago

Styles

No Light, No Signal
Apr 6, 2017
8,216
13,334
I’d be all for it depending what he wants on his next contract. I’m sure a lot of people here will not want him because all they did was look at his numbers from last year. He’s still only 26 years old and has proven he can be a number 1. A change of scenery might be good for him.
 

ColbyChaos

Marty Snoozeman's Father
Sep 27, 2017
6,213
6,495
Will County
I’d be all for it depending what he wants on his next contract. I’m sure a lot of people here will not want him because all they did was look at his numbers from last year.

He was in the 50s in every major stat on a "good" defensive team. Murray in this system would be a diaster waiting to happen. He hasnt been the same since 2017 tbh
 

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
3,919
2,841
I wouldn’t give up more than a 3rd for him if things go south with Crawford negotiations and even then he wouldn’t be my first choice of who is on the market. He needs a very solid backup due to injury concerns on top of his poor play. 2/3 of his last few years were poor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDachKnight

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
187,443
20,919
Chicagoland
Any real source on this?

Garrioch is Eklund level when it comes to anything outside of Sens

Also Murray makes no sense for a variety of reasons

1) He would cost asset/assets to bring in ,, That would be mistake #1
2) He requires a new contract that will be overpayment and nearly impossible for Hawks to fit under cap ,, That would be mistake #2
3) He is downgrade from Crawford ,, Acquiring Murray to be #1 would be mistake #3
 

Kevin Musto

Hard for Bedard
Feb 16, 2018
21,177
27,618
Any real source on this?

Garrioch is Eklund level when it comes to anything outside of Sens

Also Murray makes no sense for a variety of reasons

1) He would cost asset/assets to bring in ,, That would be mistake #1
2) He requires a new contract that will be overpayment and nearly impossible for Hawks to fit under cap ,, That would be mistake #2
3) He is downgrade from Crawford ,, Acquiring Murray to be #1 would be mistake #3
It really depends. We have no idea what the ask is for Murray, and we have no idea what his extension will look like. It's Stan's job to look into these things. Whether he makes the trade or not, I don't know, but he should be checking these things.
 

Kaners Bald Spot

Registered User
Dec 6, 2011
22,704
10,812
Kane County, IL
It really depends. We have no idea what the ask is for Murray, and we have no idea what his extension will look like. It's Stan's job to look into these things. Whether he makes the trade or not, I don't know, but he should be checking these things.
If Murray doesn't cost much to acquire, I'm ok with it. He's a potential long-term solution if he turns it around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDachKnight

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
20,877
10,486
No, unless they're taking back an equivalent amount or more of dead salary.
 

echlfreak

Registered User
Aug 1, 2003
1,955
456
At 26 years old he has decent experience in the league. Just a hair more than Delia and Lankinen who are the same age.

if it’s a pick and a prospect I’d be fine with it.
 

TheDachKnight

Formerly known as TPOEJ6489
Aug 16, 2014
1,349
1,066
For a 3rd or a 3rd and an alright prospect (not anyone with top-6/top-4 potential), sure. Anything more than that, I’ll pass.
 

echlfreak

Registered User
Aug 1, 2003
1,955
456
Didn’t the pro scouts find Panarin, Suter, Ruuta, Kempny, Delia, Lankinen???
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad