News: Matt Murray on LTIR as he is out indefinitely - Leafs cap issue solved?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nothingbutglass

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,984
3,121
How? They got assets to try him out last year. He’s either league average with pedigree in the post season, or he’s on ltir and inconsequential to the team & its cap.
That "try out" cost a roster spot and a $6 million cap hit last year. He also was the most unreliable goalie in the league. He played in 26 games. Reasonable for a backup, but he constantly was unavailable forcing Samsanov to increase his workload including twice during warmups. They once again had to dress a non-NHL backup because their cap situation was so dire. How anyone can argue that was a good signing is beyond me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jmo89

I am Canadian

AM34|WN88|MM16
May 22, 2008
6,445
2,392
Toronto
That "try out" cost a roster spot and a $6 million cap hit last year. He also was the most unreliable goalie in the league. He played in 26 games. Reasonable for a backup, but he constantly was unavailable forcing Samsanov to increase his workload including twice during warmups. They once again had to dress a non-NHL backup because their cap situation was so dire. How anyone can argue that was a good signing is beyond me.
Cap was actually 4.6M. Good thing about the trade was now its essentially off the books, and Leafs did get some assets in. Wasn't a great trade, but it's done now so not a big deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nylanderthal

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,892
6,237
That "try out" cost a roster spot and a $6 million cap hit last year. He also was the most unreliable goalie in the league. He played in 26 games. Reasonable for a backup, but he constantly was unavailable forcing Samsanov to increase his workload including twice during warmups. They once again had to dress a non-NHL backup because their cap situation was so dire. How anyone can argue that was a good signing is beyond me.
4.67m and when he’s not playing he’s not effecting the cap.
The reasons stated are why he was retained by his previous club and had assets attached to him.
not good, but not that big of a deal.
 

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,156
8,257
Ultimatley Toronto got a 3, a 7th and 26 games for no assets back

There are worse things. The opportunity cost sucks. There were other goalies out there. But if woll is a good backup then it’s fine
 

Seras

Dubas supporter
Sep 1, 2015
1,978
1,237
New Westminster, BC. Canada
That "try out" cost a roster spot and a $6 million cap hit last year. He also was the most unreliable goalie in the league. He played in 26 games. Reasonable for a backup, but he constantly was unavailable forcing Samsanov to increase his workload including twice during warmups. They once again had to dress a non-NHL backup because their cap situation was so dire. How anyone can argue that was a good signing is beyond me.

Pick one.

At the time the signing didn't look bad, he played a bit last year and got injured now he is on LTIR.

Would they do the trade knowing how it played out? Likely not, but that's now how life works
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCR74

Nothingbutglass

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,984
3,121
Pick one.

At the time the signing didn't look bad, he played a bit last year and got injured now he is on LTIR.

Would they do the trade knowing how it played out? Likely not, but that's now how life works
The correct answer is none of the above and not pick him up. "Pick one" :laugh: Leafs fans
 

Nothingbutglass

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,984
3,121
He is the first goalie in the history of the NHL to be the most unreliable goalie in the NHL while also being a reasonable backup, thank you for this insight.
Stats were reasonable for a backup but unfortunately he was always too injured to be counted on. But sure, great use of $6 million and $4.6 of cap space. Worked out well.
 

Recipe Unlimited

Registered User
Sep 1, 2019
1,029
1,505
That will never happen.

It would be dead simple to have some sort of quasi cap formula for the playoffs that stops teams like Tampa from running a $90m playoff roster because of LTIR.
Why won't it happen.

Just make it so on the last day of the regular season, any player on LTIR is not eligble for the playoffs. If the team expects the player to come back from injury, they can just activate them from LTIR (and put them on regular IR to open up a roster spot). If the team can't afford the cap space after activating the player on LTIR, then sucks for them, they shouldn't have traded for extra players that would put them over the cap.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,701
17,078
Mulberry Street
Why won't it happen.

Just make it so on the last day of the regular season, any player on LTIR is not eligble for the playoffs. If the team expects the player to come back from injury, they can just activate them from LTIR (and put them on regular IR to open up a roster spot). If the team can't afford the cap space after activating the player on LTIR, then sucks for them, they shouldn't have traded for extra players that would put them over the cap.

This kind of thinking doesn't work.

Say Player X gets hurt in the middle of February and they ill be out until the beginning of June. Why should the team get punished for finding a replacement? :facepalm:

Imo it was the Leafs getting caught red-handed cheating the system. It's not just that he said he and the Leafs were cheating the system, but the guy was even snowboarding while supposedly injured.


I remember he also said things like that he was ready to play, etc. It was like he didn't want to be on LTIR anymore. He played on some bad rosters and I think he wanted to play with the improved roster. The thing ended with him shutting up and failing another physical. I do wonder if that was a case where the league circled the wagons for the good of everyone leagued wide and snuffed the whole thing. All it would take is some kind of threat to Lupul, like taking him to court and bleeding him dry with litigation, and maybe even pinning blame on him for the whole thing.

He likely had a playable injury, so it was a case where if he would get on board and say the right things he could fail a physical just based on what he said

NHL literally investigated this and agreed with the Leafs. Not sure what point you're trying to make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Namikaze Minato

Rec T

Registered User
Jun 1, 2007
1,483
1,150
NKY
Why won't it happen.

Just make it so on the last day of the regular season, any player on LTIR is not eligble for the playoffs. If the team expects the player to come back from injury, they can just activate them from LTIR (and put them on regular IR to open up a roster spot). If the team can't afford the cap space after activating the player on LTIR, then sucks for them, they shouldn't have traded for extra players that would put them over the cap.
I'd go a little further that that and make it that the player needs to be on the active roster/regular IR for the last 3 (maybe 5) games of the regular season to be eligible to play in the playoffs. They don't necessarily have to dress for those games, but they do have to be available and counting towards the cap. Just one game is fairly easy for a GM to do some short term tap dancing. Three though and they'll have to really rethink their cap shenanigans.

(maintaining the "if you're on LTIR on the last day of the season then you're ineligible for the playoffs" to prevent a LTIR shuffle to get the original player back, team compliant, and a miraculous recovery by the player just put on it once the playoffs start)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frenzy31

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
15,998
23,412
I want to say I am surprised this thread is at 56 pages, with the same handful of folks who are in every Leafs thread arguing around and around how a goalie they all said was injury prone isn't actually injured and the Leafs are cheating.. But I would be lying.

People had themselves all hyped up for some made up scenario where the Leafs give up a bunch of assets and when it never happened (and was never going to happen the alternative was buyout with a 600k cap hit), they are upset and want the blood they were promised.

End of the day, I would hope it is a non controversial statement that concussions are not an exact science. Symptoms can come and go. Considering his history of them, all it took was Murray saying he is not good to go.

Now is it possible that Murray could be good to go 6 months into the season? Sure. But he has incentive to not do that by being paid an extra 2M for being on LTIR instead of being bought out.

I also don't really see the great injustice here. If they had said Auston Matthews had surgery and is out until the playoffs and the Leafs go out and spend 11M on the roster and he is practicing and playing for weeks and suits up game 1 perfectly healthy, yeah there is a reason to call that shit out. But they haven't done that despite other teams doing it.

This is a player who we got paid to take because he could not stay healthy, who proceeded to not be able to stay healthy all season long, and is still not healthy and for some reason this is some absurd outcome for folks.
 

leafsfan2point0

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
1,862
2,166
I want to say I am surprised this thread is at 56 pages, with the same handful of folks who are in every Leafs thread arguing around and around how a goalie they all said was injury prone isn't actually injured and the Leafs are cheating.. But I would be lying.

People had themselves all hyped up for some made up scenario where the Leafs give up a bunch of assets and when it never happened (and was never going to happen the alternative was buyout with a 600k cap hit), they are upset and want the blood they were promised.

End of the day, I would hope it is a non controversial statement that concussions are not an exact science. Symptoms can come and go. Considering his history of them, all it took was Murray saying he is not good to go.

Now is it possible that Murray could be good to go 6 months into the season? Sure. But he has incentive to not do that by being paid an extra 2M for being on LTIR instead of being bought out.

I also don't really see the great injustice here. If they had said Auston Matthews had surgery and is out until the playoffs and the Leafs go out and spend 11M on the roster and he is practicing and playing for weeks and suits up game 1 perfectly healthy, yeah there is a reason to call that shit out. But they haven't done that despite other teams doing it.

This is a player who we got paid to take because he could not stay healthy, who proceeded to not be able to stay healthy all season long, and is still not healthy and for some reason this is some absurd outcome for folks.
Drops mic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nylanderthal

TheKrebsCycle

Throwing Confetti for Perfetti
Jun 1, 2011
6,405
2,002
Barrie
I want to say I am surprised this thread is at 56 pages, with the same handful of folks who are in every Leafs thread arguing around and around how a goalie they all said was injury prone isn't actually injured and the Leafs are cheating.. But I would be lying.

People had themselves all hyped up for some made up scenario where the Leafs give up a bunch of assets and when it never happened (and was never going to happen the alternative was buyout with a 600k cap hit), they are upset and want the blood they were promised.

End of the day, I would hope it is a non controversial statement that concussions are not an exact science. Symptoms can come and go. Considering his history of them, all it took was Murray saying he is not good to go.

Now is it possible that Murray could be good to go 6 months into the season? Sure. But he has incentive to not do that by being paid an extra 2M for being on LTIR instead of being bought out.

I also don't really see the great injustice here. If they had said Auston Matthews had surgery and is out until the playoffs and the Leafs go out and spend 11M on the roster and he is practicing and playing for weeks and suits up game 1 perfectly healthy, yeah there is a reason to call that shit out. But they haven't done that despite other teams doing it.

This is a player who we got paid to take because he could not stay healthy, who proceeded to not be able to stay healthy all season long, and is still not healthy and for some reason this is some absurd outcome for folks.
This ^Well put. In the other Matt Murray thread people were saying 1 st plus , or Knies and 2 2nds; even Nylander was bandied about as ammunition to dump him ( despite very cheap buyout existing , but blinders were on for most ) . Humongous misses/total pipe dreams .
 
Last edited:

MCR74

Registered User
Nov 11, 2022
3,006
3,238
I want to say I am surprised this thread is at 56 pages, with the same handful of folks who are in every Leafs thread arguing around and around how a goalie they all said was injury prone isn't actually injured and the Leafs are cheating.. But I would be lying.

People had themselves all hyped up for some made up scenario where the Leafs give up a bunch of assets and when it never happened (and was never going to happen the alternative was buyout with a 600k cap hit), they are upset and want the blood they were promised.

End of the day, I would hope it is a non controversial statement that concussions are not an exact science. Symptoms can come and go. Considering his history of them, all it took was Murray saying he is not good to go.

Now is it possible that Murray could be good to go 6 months into the season? Sure. But he has incentive to not do that by being paid an extra 2M for being on LTIR instead of being bought out.

I also don't really see the great injustice here. If they had said Auston Matthews had surgery and is out until the playoffs and the Leafs go out and spend 11M on the roster and he is practicing and playing for weeks and suits up game 1 perfectly healthy, yeah there is a reason to call that shit out. But they haven't done that despite other teams doing it.

This is a player who we got paid to take because he could not stay healthy, who proceeded to not be able to stay healthy all season long, and is still not healthy and for some reason this is some absurd outcome for folks.

Good post.

The same losers who are in every Leafs thread wouldn't be saying a damn thing if their team was doing this.
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,279
10,929
He is the first goalie in the history of the NHL to be the most unreliable goalie in the NHL while also being a reasonable backup, thank you for this insight.
No, seems like you can't read when your eyes go red.

Him being unreliable is about his play. Him playing in 26 games all year is the part that is "reasonable for a backup".
 

Zur En Arrh

Registered User
Apr 16, 2022
876
833
I want to say I am surprised this thread is at 56 pages, with the same handful of folks who are in every Leafs thread arguing around and around how a goalie they all said was injury prone isn't actually injured and the Leafs are cheating.. But I would be lying.

People had themselves all hyped up for some made up scenario where the Leafs give up a bunch of assets and when it never happened (and was never going to happen the alternative was buyout with a 600k cap hit), they are upset and want the blood they were promised.

End of the day, I would hope it is a non controversial statement that concussions are not an exact science. Symptoms can come and go. Considering his history of them, all it took was Murray saying he is not good to go.

Now is it possible that Murray could be good to go 6 months into the season? Sure. But he has incentive to not do that by being paid an extra 2M for being on LTIR instead of being bought out.

I also don't really see the great injustice here. If they had said Auston Matthews had surgery and is out until the playoffs and the Leafs go out and spend 11M on the roster and he is practicing and playing for weeks and suits up game 1 perfectly healthy, yeah there is a reason to call that shit out. But they haven't done that despite other teams doing it.

This is a player who we got paid to take because he could not stay healthy, who proceeded to not be able to stay healthy all season long, and is still not healthy and for some reason this is some absurd outcome for folks.


Annnnd boom goes the dynamite (dx chop the haters)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $1,752.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $220.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $15.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad