He's been fighting injuries all year too. For a guy who depends on his quickness, losing a half step or any confidence in his hands can be real tough to adjust toGrzelcyk's statistical decline has a lot to do with the dramatic decline in the quality of forwards he plays with. He was perfectly suited to playing with that top line, just get the puck up ice and let the two best possession forwards in the NHL do their thing. The game is a lot harder for him now, but he's adjusting to it, and moving him off of the top pair helps. Have to think he's in every day once the playoffs start.
I don't necessarily disagree but I'm looking at the other two left handed defensemen who could play over him, one doesn't belong in the league yet and the other is a 6/7 who doesn't compliment Carlo or Peeke all that well. A top 4 left handed D should be one of their top priorities in the offseason but for now, they have who they have.Grzelcyk has never been a positive player in the post season, though. I can't agree with him being an every day when the playoff starts. The odd game? Probably.
Since 2017-18 he's a -19 in 63 games
McAvoy: +1
Bergeron: +10 (he was -6 last year which was a huge woof)
Marchand: +7
Pastrnak: +1
In my opinion Grzelcyk's play dropped off SIGNIFICANTLY in the post season.
Makes you wonder why they try to upgrade him to every deadline and made him a healthy scratch to start last years playoffs.is that good?
In the playoffs it’s kinda importantForget these analytics. All I care about is how many goals go in when they're on the ice and how many they keep out. Stupid analytics.
This, and shouldn't teams be all over a player like that? Should be able to get a pretty high pick for him, no?Makes you wonder why they try to upgrade him to every deadline and made him a healthy scratch to start last years playoffs.
Also you would think they would have at least had preliminary contract extension talks with such a dominant defenseman in his walk year. Or maybe they see it as benefiting from playing with a Norris caliber defenseman and the perfection line?
In the playoffs it’s kinda important
this logic has never failed you beforeThis, and shouldn't teams be all over a player like that? Should be able to get a pretty high pick for him, no?
What did he say was wrong? That was all true at the time. Heinen has turned in a very good season, playing with some very good players. I guess we will see in the summer how other teams view him, and I like him a lot and hope he remains a Bruin,this logic has never failed you before
View attachment 845643
gtyz can thank the 63 37 88 line for those numbers.Forget these analytics. All I care about is how many goals go in when they're on the ice and how many they keep out. Stupid analytics.
Yep. He’s so short we can’t possibly give him credit for his past success whatsoever. McAvoy is 6’ so we can give him credit though.gtyz can thank the 63 37 88 line for those numbers.
mcavoy has been saving his ass since 2017Yep. He’s so short we can’t possibly give him credit for his past success whatsoever. McAvoy is 6’ so we can give him credit though.
Couldn't possibly be that Mac is the much better player?Yep. He’s so short we can’t possibly give him credit for his past success whatsoever. McAvoy is 6’ so we can give him credit though.
And he was, he’s been solid for the Bruins this year. Said that several times.this logic has never failed you before
View attachment 845643
Do those numbers you posted include post season?Yep. He’s so short we can’t possibly give him credit for his past success whatsoever. McAvoy is 6’ so we can give him credit though.
He’s also on the list twice with chara as wellmcavoy has been saving his ass since 2017
Not sure how to get em all. ButI'm still waiting for confirmation if those "elite" numbers include the post season, which is where most debates around Grzelcyk start.
I'd also like to see those same stats with Mac away from Gryz and visa versa. Think it's pretty obvious seeing Mac on the list twice that he's an elite player either way, and probably propping Gryz up quite a bitI'm still waiting for confirmation if those "elite" numbers include the post season, which is where most debates around Grzelcyk start.
I'd also like to see those same stats with Mac away from Gryz and visa versa. Think it's pretty obvious seeing Mac on the list twice that he's an elite player either way, and probably propping Gryz up quite a bit
Appreciated...Gryz takes a big hit away from Mac in actual GF/GA...the expected numbers are great but my guess is the two never line up because Gryz provides such little offense himself and needs a stronger partner beside himLine Stats - Natural Stat Trick
www.naturalstattrick.com
And at some point all the great xGF and xGA means absolutely nothing when they aren't turning into actual on ice production...13 GF and 24 GA without Mac shows me a lotThose "expected" numbers for Grzelcyk didn't meet actual expectations.
Yep. If we're basing expected GF are we allowed to critique him for what seems to be no offensive ability? I mean, we're expecting it, right?And at some point all the great xGF and xGA means absolutely nothing when they aren't turning into actual on ice production...13 GF and 24 GA without Mac shows me a lot
It is interesting though that Mac does better with Gryz than he does with everyone else too though, but they were also getting bigger offensive zone starts together than apart. Gryz down to 43% away from MacAvoyAppreciated...Gryz takes a big hit away from Mac in actual GF/GA...the expected numbers are great but my guess is the two never line up because Gryz provides such little offense himself and needs a stronger partner beside him