- Dec 10, 2012
- 39,649
- 18,068
Crazy how a guy who is injured can’t score 3 in a game.
He played only 7 fewer games before the age of 22 than Boldy has so far, and he's allegedly the much better goal scorer
Crazy how a guy who is injured can’t score 3 in a game.
4 career hats vs 1 career hat. The guy with 4 has played fewer career games.He played only 7 fewer games before the age of 22 than Boldy has so far, and he's allegedly the much better goal scorer
4 career hats vs 1 career hat. The guy with 4 has played fewer career games.
Sorry, meant 3... lolBut Boldy has "only" 3 hat tricks though.
This season:He played only 7 fewer games before the age of 22 than Boldy has so far, and he's allegedly the much better goal scorer
Kind of an oversell there.This season:
Boldy 74gp 28g
Caufield 46gp 26g (42g per 74 game pace)
Last 2 seasons:
Caufield 113gp 49g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Career:
Caufield 123gp 53g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Surely even you could figure that Caufield’s goal scoring is much better.
You used the age as the marker, but when you look at D+2 and D+3 you see that Caufield played significantly more games at a younger age. Then D+4 Boldy finally caught up in games in a season where Caufield was injured, but on pace for over 40 goals and could have been pushing 50.
I still think it isn’t close. A stupid stat like hat tricks before age 22 by Americans doesn’t change that Caufield is significantly better at scoring goals.
This season:
Boldy 74gp 28g
Caufield 46gp 26g (42g per 74 game pace)
Last 2 seasons:
Caufield 113gp 49g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Career:
Caufield 123gp 53g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Surely even you could figure that Caufield’s goal scoring is much better.
You used the age as the marker, but when you look at D+2 and D+3 you see that Caufield played significantly more games at a younger age. Then D+4 Boldy finally caught up in games in a season where Caufield was injured, but on pace for over 40 goals and could have been pushing 50.
I still think it isn’t close. A stupid stat like hat tricks before age 22 by Americans doesn’t change that Caufield is significantly better at scoring goals.
This season:
Boldy 74gp 28g
Caufield 46gp 26g (42g per 74 game pace)
Last 2 seasons:
Caufield 113gp 49g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Career:
Caufield 123gp 53g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Surely even you could figure that Caufield’s goal scoring is much better.
You used the age as the marker, but when you look at D+2 and D+3 you see that Caufield played significantly more games at a younger age. Then D+4 Boldy finally caught up in games in a season where Caufield was injured, but on pace for over 40 goals and could have been pushing 50.
I still think it isn’t close. A stupid stat like hat tricks before age 22 by Americans doesn’t change that Caufield is significantly better at scoring goals.
You don't need to prove anything, they're just messing with you. It's clear from looking at the simple stat line alone that Caufield is a least a bit better of a goal scorer.This season:
Boldy 74gp 28g
Caufield 46gp 26g (42g per 74 game pace)
Last 2 seasons:
Caufield 113gp 49g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Career:
Caufield 123gp 53g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Surely even you could figure that Caufield’s goal scoring is much better.
You used the age as the marker, but when you look at D+2 and D+3 you see that Caufield played significantly more games at a younger age. Then D+4 Boldy finally caught up in games in a season where Caufield was injured, but on pace for over 40 goals and could have been pushing 50.
I still think it isn’t close. A stupid stat like hat tricks before age 22 by Americans doesn’t change that Caufield is significantly better at scoring goals.
This season:This season:
Boldy 74gp 28g
Caufield 46gp 26g (42g per 74 game pace)
Last 2 seasons:
Caufield 113gp 49g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Career:
Caufield 123gp 53g
Boldy 121gp 43g
Surely even you could figure that Caufield’s goal scoring is much better.
You used the age as the marker, but when you look at D+2 and D+3 you see that Caufield played significantly more games at a younger age. Then D+4 Boldy finally caught up in games in a season where Caufield was injured, but on pace for over 40 goals and could have been pushing 50.
I still think it isn’t close. A stupid stat like hat tricks before age 22 by Americans doesn’t change that Caufield is significantly better at scoring goals.
Not really. If he maintained his pace, he would have 14 more goals at this point.Kind of an oversell there.
I’ve never said Caufield is a better player. I’ve said he’s a better goal scorer and debatably a better fit for what the franchise needs (goal scoring). I do agree Boldy is a better player, but I will hold the line on the goal scoring and franchise needs assessment as “debatable” on if Caufield would be a better fit.Caufield is more of a one trick pony. Until he can add other elements to his game other than goal scoring, I still prefer Boldy.
Better fit for what? The team?I’ve never said Caufield is a better player. I’ve said he’s a better goal scorer and debatably a better fit for what the franchise needs (goal scoring). I do agree Boldy is a better player, but I will hold the line on the goal scoring and franchise needs assessment as “debatable” on if Caufield would be a better fit.
I’ve never said Caufield is a better player. I’ve said he’s a better goal scorer and debatably a better fit for what the franchise needs (goal scoring). I do agree Boldy is a better player, but I will hold the line on the goal scoring and franchise needs assessment as “debatable” on if Caufield would be a better fit.
The only question is, how many?We also have to deduct points from Caufield because he was a Badger.
They did say 21 or younger before that. If Boldy does it before Apr 5th, he's in the window.Years are a little off.
Boldy is about to turn 22.
Gaborik turned 20 in the middle of his first 30 goal season.
Still seems pretty liberal at the end in order to try and fit them in the same window, which they're really not.They did say 21 or younger before that. If Boldy does it before Apr 5th, he's in the window.
Still pretty impressive thoughStill seems pretty liberal at the end in order to try and fit them in the same window, which they're really not.
But yes, both under 22, just one way more than the other.