5,600+ forum posts doesn't make you any more qualified than the other guy with 57 career forum posts. Until you become one that the masses listen to you are just spewing hot air like most of the people in this thread. I will take a former NHL'er viewpoint on a situation before i take you or your made up NHL and college buddies flawed responses. Thanks for coming out!
LOL, yes, because I really have a lot to gain by "making up" stories about all my "buddies" in the NHL. I'm friggin' Canadian, man.... I literally went to school with three NHLers and played junior hockey with a few more. Hell, Daniel Sedin lives down the block from me. Coming across a few NHLers in your lifetime is not something to brag about... unless you're 8 years old.
My point is that I've come a across quite a few professional hockey players in my life and while some of them are highly intelligent, college-educated individuals, others are pretty far from that. Why should I be forced to blindly value their opinion just because they played hockey professionally? And what even makes Jeff O'Neil's thoughts on player safety and concussions more relevant than the next guy? Is he employed by the NHL Department of Player Safety? Is he a doctor? No, then why the hell should I just blindly follow his opinion?
And how can you not see the complete lack of logic in the comments you just made? What about the coaches, players and GMs who have voiced their opinion on this matter and directly oppose the views of someone like Jeff O'Neil? Should I just ignore their opinion because Jeff O'Neil played in the NHL? Oh, wait... they also played/coached/GMed in the same league... what are we to do now?
You need to consider the source and think for yourself, not just blindly follow someone because they "played in the NHL". And I'm pretty that, if you disagreed with O'Neil's comments, you wouldn't be going on about his NHL "experience" and "pedigree". It's just convenient for you to prop his hockey knowledge up on a pedestal because it serves your agenda.