No he isn’t. He is good at moving the puck. He has to do it so often because the other d is so inept that the other team crashes his side with no worries. He has no outlet half the time. The fact he has to do it so often and is the only option to do so leads to a lot of mistakes. He isn’t experienced or elite enough to completely carry a second pair with a dead anchor like pysyk. It’s just not even reasonable.
no question it's a team game and you gotta also look at the forwards. I mean on that last TO, I don't think he had any F outlets on our side of the ice.
(I was at the game last night rats so pipe down...)
still, no other player has so consistently made such catastrophic mistakes. blaming pysyk is just silly, though I agree that matheson's at least OK most nights until the inevitable. also agree that we're not going to just dump him.
blaming reimer is also just silly. last night was one of those nights when he bailed out his team. heck, on one of the top line's shifts in the 2nd (maybe midway?) alone, we turned the puck over 3-4 times, leading to several grade A chances which reimer stopped.
this is just a bad team. players aren't making plays and don't appear to be working toward the same end in an effective manner.
you know what's consistent? 19 TOs. consistently close to double our opponents all season long. a big part of that is team play and strategy of course.
ultimately, it was a familiar story - failure to finish some big chances, mounting turnovers and finally, a catastrophic mistake.
bad team.