Bounces R Way
Registered User
I was using him as an example, but lets see where Stone is in 7 years. At this point in his age 26 season, Bergeron had a cup and a gold medal. He won his first selke after his age 26 season. It's not Mark Stone's fault that the NHL didn't go to the Olympics and he was drafted by Ottawa so he hasn't won a cup. He's an excellent player. Of the RW in the league, I'd take Kucherov and Kane over him, probably. That's it. Mostly because they are so dominant offensively, but I think you could make a case that Stone has similar value. Kane makes $10.5m. Kucherov, $9.5 and took a home town discount. Voracek makes $8.25M. Kessel makes $8m. Taraseko, $7.5. Given most of those guys signed their deals when the cap was in the mid $70m range, and Stone is better than all of them, I think $10m for him is easily defensible.
Let's reframe a little. Over the past 2 seasons, Stone is 6th in the NHL for RW in P/GP. He has 28 PPP in that time period and he was deployed in the Ozone 52% of the time. Of the 5 guys ahead of him, the one with the next fewest PPP is Patrick Kane with 50. The next closest in deployment is Wheeler at 59%. Stone has the highest even strength ppg of any RW in hockey the last 2 years.
Now his linemates.
Kane's most common line is Strome and Debrincat.
Kucherov's is Johnson and Point
Rantanen is Mac and Landeskog
Wheeler plays with Scheifele and Connor or Ehlers.
Kessel plays with Malkin and Hagelin or Pearson.
Mark Stone plays with Colin White and Brady Tkachuk.
Would you pay $10m a year for Mark Stone if he was RW to Marchand and Bergeron? He's be on a top PP unit, be deployed 60% in the offensive zone and have prolific linemates like everyone above him in scoring. Is it reasonable to think that he is a 1.25 PPG player in those circumstances if hes a 1.0 PPG player in his current circumstances? That is a 100 point player.
Frankly, i think the argument AGAINST stone getting $10m a year is pretty flimsy.
Kucherov has two 100pt seasons and five seasons better than any Stone has put up so far. Kane had 3 cups, a Conn Smythe, and won an Art Ross with 106pts the year Chicago gave him that contract. He has 123pts in 127 playoff games, compared to Stone's 13 in 27. Tarasenko also has four seasons better than Stone's career high, including four 30+ goal campaigns. Kessel and Voracek ya I'd probably take Stone over them, but again they've had seasons better than him as well.
Stone's best scoring finish ever was tied with four other players for 30th. He's 7th in RW scoring, 11th for wingers, and 25th overall right now. Duchene has a higher pts/gp this year. Maybe some people see a 100pt player there, I'm not one of them, and personally paying eight figures for a guy who might be a 100pt player I see as bad business. You give someone that kind of contract who already is a 100pt player. But we live in a world where Eichel and Matthews got huge $$$ despite never breaking 70pts, so maybe I just don't know the price of butter and Stone will too. Stone doing what he is with linemates like that is impressive, especially him managing to be a positive CF% player on a team as poor possession wise as the Sens, but I think suggesting his production would explode in better conditions is wishful thinking. Loui Eriksson had three 70pt seasons with Dallas around the same age Stone is now and was touted as one of the game's top 2way wingers before going to a better team in Boston. He mostly disappointed there, and is disappointing now in Vancouver.