That's total BS!! Montreal is not a top destination for free agents. Over 25 years we never had one sign here. Why wouldn't a Boston have an advantage with a Chara? How many cup wins does Boston have if Chara signs elsewhere? They got lucky and have an advantage. It is not our GM. You guys want to blame everything on the GM. We have a great GM!
All GMs did the same if stuck around long enough. It is parity in the league and if you can inherit/fluke an advantage.
Look at Ken Holland? Detroit is a terrible team, missed the playoffs 3 straight years. He was voted GM of the decade for 2000s. He won 3 cups and 4 President trophys. Did Holland go from being hockey genius to buffoon over night? Of course not. He inherited an advantage.
All GMs have made bad trades and had terrible drafts.
Scotty Bowman ran Buffalo into the ground. He would be an idiot by your scale. Glen Sather build a dynasty in Edmonton. Rangers are the league doormats. He inherited Gretzky, he had an advantage.
How good would Pittsburgh be last 15 years if they don"t win a lottery and get Crosby? How many Cups do Chicago or LA win if not not terrible team and draft high for 5 years? They got an advantage by being terrible for 10 years and draft high every year. After awhile they have to hit the jackpot
It is not our GM! What are you crapping all over Marc for? We've had 5 or 6 GMs over last 20-25 years. They all done relatively the same. Bergevin got further than most of them actually. They can't be all morons
I have no idea what you're babbling on about. Honestly, maybe one of the worst posts I've ever read here. I feel dumber for reading it.
First, again, Hamrlik, Cammalleri and Radulov were solid UFAs we signed, so right away, your head is way up your own ass.
Second, take your Pittsburgh and Chicago examples. Pittsburgh needed saving from Mario Lemieux to not go into bankruptcy and as you said, if not for getting Crosby/Malkin/Fleury (all top 1-2 picks) which made them more credible than UFAs wouldn't sign there. Chicago lost local TV coverage at one point during their struggles, and then they drafted top guys, got better and became an interesting destination again.
Most top free agents like to go to good teams. Why wouldn't they?
Nobody is crapping on Bergevin for not signing Tavares or any top UFA. They're crapping on him because he has no f***ing direction. Whether UFAs are interested or not, he says it himself, he isn't big on giving out huge deals to free agents. At the same time, he doesn't want to trade away his good prospects. So...no big UFAs. No trades swapping young kids for proven solid roster players. We also aren't doing a proper tank so not getting the picks to draft a Crosby, Ovi, Malkin, Toews, Kane, etc...
We are in this neverending battle between PO bubble and ''good but not good enough'' state.
Bergevin got us futher than previous GMs? How do you figure that mate? We went to the ECF under Gainey as well, and we never missed the POs 3 out of 4 years. Bergevin is a farce. How in the f***ing world do you give a pass to a GM who's made us miss the POs 3 times in the last 4 years? Important to note that in all of these years, his public objective was to make the POs, he failed 3 out of 4 times.
Honestly, what the f*** are you defending him for?