FameFlame069
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2017
- 2,992
- 546
You think Miller is better than a top pair Rd?Tampa will beat that offer for Brady with the 27th + 1st 20 + Katchouk + Miller?
You think Miller is better than a top pair Rd?Tampa will beat that offer for Brady with the 27th + 1st 20 + Katchouk + Miller?
Considering how much the Sens love Brady, I doubt he’s being traded.
You think Miller is better than a top pair Rd?
Understandable. Was just thinking that they would gain more dead cap so at the deadline they could retain on a Boedker or someone else to get a better return. A Condon buyout is 2.2 less than Callahan so you'll be at the cap floor but if you trade a player you might drop below, dead cap in Callahan keeps you above the floor more to retain more. Tampa could probably retain 10% to bring the actual cash between Condon and Callahan closer.
Regarding Benning, I felt he had neutral value. Is he a legit bottom pair D? Yes. Is he overpaid for that role? Yes, but he’s an ideal acquisition for the Sens given they need to reach the floor and he still possesses some developmental upside (just not enough for us to pay him 1.9 to do the same job Caleb Jones could do).
As for Gagner, I feel a lot of fellow Oiler fans were disillusioned with his performance based on nostalgia and the fact he played better than Spooner. Being better than Spooner is hardly a reason to bring him back. He’s good enough to play a bottom 6 role on the Sens, but that doesn’t change the fact he has negative value.
Let me frame it this way, we do this trade and use the 5 mil in space to sign a guy like Gus Nyquist, that’s a big win vs keeping those two on the roster. I’d much rather have Nyquist and Jones in the lineup vs Gagner and Benning.
But are they decent offers? Dube has top six(I'd say second line myself) and Kylington has top four potential, Hamonic/Brodie add to the right side and a 1st or two are always handy
A lot. Ottawa didn’t trade Stone for Brannstrom just to turn around and trade him for Namestnikov, a third round pick and some guy I’ve never heard of.
Honestly, I don’t think Brannstrom is available.
To OTT: Gagner (3.2m), Benning (1.9m), EDM 4th (100th pick)
To EDM: Adam Tambellini (whom we don’t qualify)
Oilers gain 5 mil in cap space, Sens get closer to the cap floor and get 2 guys who can play in their lineup everyday but have contracts that expire at the end of the year. Gagner brings some lottery magic (was there for 3 1st OA’s - though we didn’t actually win in 2011). Gagner has negative value - hence the 4th, Benning neutral value (probably not worth 1.9 per, but a solid #6 Dman who can put up 20pts and is a sneaky good hitter).
I don’t believe either Gagner or Benning have negative value. I don’t think this is a good deal for us. Cap space is great and all but we’d have to replace those guys.
What fun is this kinda thread if i cant trade for Brannstrom?
You got something for Stone, or he would have walked free.
Brodie has one year left and has a NTC. Not overly interested in him, and I doubt he’d be interested in us. Late first rounders don’t excite me much. Hamonic has one year left on his deal. Not the type of players Ottawa should be targeting.
Dube and Kylington may have top six and top four potential, but so do lots of players. Cowen, Weircoch, Puempel and Lazar did too, and we all know how that worked out.
Ottawa would be better off keeping Tkachuk.
Yah so OTT takes on EDM trash for a 4th round pick? Get real bro, it'll cost you at leats a guy like Jones or Benson to pull off something like that
Both Gagner and Benning have negative value, a lot of it
Well “bro,” perhaps you should evaluate the proposal from every angle.
Facts:
- The Sens need to reach the cap floor, correct?
- The Sens aren’t looking to compete (not even Dorion could say they are with a straight face).
- The Sens are the most toxic destination for UFA’s in the league right now.
- Most teams trying to shed contracts have to deal with partial NMC’s.
Everybody thinks the Sens will simply take dead money to reach the floor via a contract like David Clarkson. The guy still has a 16 team NTC, why would he accept a deal to the Sens so he can make less money after tax?
There’s not nearly as many candidates out there for Ottawa to reach the floor as one would like to think.
Give me better options and I’ll believe you. I’m waiting.
Two offers from the Flames, I'll try making it fair, as I like Ottawa and they are in my top 5, so here goes....
Brady + Anderson*(50%) + 3rd in 19 for 1st(26th) 19 + 1st 20 + Dube + Brodie
Or
Brady + Anderson*(33%) + 2nd 20 for 1st 20 + Dube + Kylington + Hamonic + 3rd 19?
Ottawa won't have trouble meeting the cap for. If you want us to take your trash you better sweeten the pot. a 4th rounder is a complete joke. 2 bad contracts??? Come onTo OTT: Gagner (3.2m), Benning (1.9m), EDM 4th (100th pick)
To EDM: Adam Tambellini (whom we don’t qualify)
Oilers gain 5 mil in cap space, Sens get closer to the cap floor and get 2 guys who can play in their lineup everyday but have contracts that expire at the end of the year. Gagner brings some lottery magic (was there for 3 1st OA’s - though we didn’t actually win in 2011). Gagner has negative value - hence the 4th, Benning neutral value (probably not worth 1.9 per, but a solid #6 Dman who can put up 20pts and is a sneaky good hitter).
Have fun signing Tkachuk thenNo to Dube. Giving him up just to trade Neal makes no sense.
Abramov, Davidsson, a 1st and maybe another one?Duchene for .................. oh wait a minute
Ottawa won't have trouble meeting the floor. It's simple math. Read a book.Well “bro,” perhaps you should evaluate the proposal from every angle.
Facts:
- The Sens need to reach the cap floor, correct?
- The Sens aren’t looking to compete (not even Dorion could say they are with a straight face).
- The Sens are the most toxic destination for UFA’s in the league right now.
- Most teams trying to shed contracts have to deal with partial NMC’s.
Everybody thinks the Sens will simply take dead money to reach the floor via a contract like David Clarkson. The guy still has a 16 team NTC, why would he accept a deal to the Sens so he can make less money after tax?
There’s not nearly as many candidates out there for Ottawa to reach the floor as one would like to think.
Give me better options and I’ll believe you. I’m waiting.
Have fun signing Tkachuk then