No one was required to impose a minimum games requirement into Norris voting.
I think Makar’s dynamism factors in for neutrals. It does whether it should or shouldn’t. His game looks more exciting. It the same reason why Pettersson and Eichel win these polls over players such as Barkov. There’s no other reason for the guy who won the Norris to have only 30% of the vote. Fox is the more accomplished player right now.
Just because it's not part of the award criteria doesn't mean games played hasn't always clearly been a factor in voting. Come on now.
And while flash likely plays a role in these types of votes, saying Fox should have more votes because he's more accomplished is silly. The award is subjective, so the fact that Fox won shouldn't hold any weight over those who disagreed with him winning or those who would have voted for Fox due to games played, but thought Makar was better per game. It would be one thing if Makar wasn't at Norris level, but he obviously was and received a significant number of first place votes. And that's not even mentioning that this one season doesn't factor in age, other seasons, potential, etc