What's great is he wasn't drafted to crack the top 6, he's going to be a perfect third liner, and for once its a good thing
Until people start whining about him being inconsistent offensively and not scoring 40+ points without PP time.
What's great is he wasn't drafted to crack the top 6, he's going to be a perfect third liner, and for once its a good thing
Until people start whining about him being inconsistent offensively and not scoring 40+ points without PP time.
...so anyone disagree that Gilbert was by far the worst Hab on the ice tonite??...
I keep saying this but Gonchar was a great pickup for the Habs. He's been pretty steady and has really helped Beaulieu with his game. In 34 games played he's had 1G - 11A and is +7.
Not bad for a guy Stars fans said was finished and couldn't play defense when the trade went down.
...so anyone disagree that Gilbert was by far the worst Hab on the ice tonite??...
Gilbert didn't look bad except that time when he tripped on the blue line and allowed one of the worst team in the league a golden scoring chance and Jacob Josef-who buried it. That's unacceptable. Prust was ok.I thought Gilbert played alright.
One time I singled him out for making a bad pass but I really think ol Gilby is good at disrupting a forecheck with a quick poke or slipping in on body position on a guy.
There's zero flash to his game but I like it.
Prust was the worst for my money tonight.
To be fair, Higgins did have some solid seasons with the Habs. He got too cocky (i.e interview where he said he could score 40 goals) and got some shoulder problems that hurt him.
I'd take him back on our team if we could get him for like a third rounder.
Read my posts.
I dont want any undersized players on this roster other than Gallagher.
Ship out DD, Andrighetto, Thomas, Dumont, Reway, Lekhonen tomorrow and I would be extremely happy that the Habs are making progress.
Uh -- have you ever actually watched what are sometimes called ice hockey games? You do know that there is zero correlation between the physical size of a roster and its success? And that bigger has demonstrably nothing to do with being better? http://grantland.com/features/fast-small-vs-slow-big-ice/
If the well established facts in the case don't convince you, try common sense: last spring a big, tough team took on a smaller, quicker team. One team was called the Boston Bruins. The other team was called the Montreal Canadiens. You'd be surprised by the result.
Shame the size-gogglers weren't around in the glory years. They could have shipped out Yvan Cournoyer ,too. No need for a smurf like that!
Remember how the Sens ran us out of the rink year before in playoffs, or Rangers had no fear taking liberties with Price. Team has to have a balance
Apparently, according to a video posted (Weise I think it was who said), they had some of their hardest practices of the season this week. Maybe they need more of that?
Remember how the Sens ran us out of the rink year before in playoffs, or Rangers had no fear taking liberties with Price. Team has to have a balance
The **** are you talking about? That has nothing to do with size. The Habs could have easily done that to Lundqvist and there would have been no response by the rangers. Who is tougher than prust on their team? Terrible example.
Using the Rangers to prove a point on size is laughable. They had small players too like Zucs, St. Louis, Hagelin and soft defensemen like Staal and Stralman in their top 4.
They play a canadiens brand of hockey, but they just played it better than us. Kreider wouldn't have stopped running the goalie even if Chara was on the team. He does it all the time.
The Ottawa series went out of wack because White cheap shotted a guy and looked for trouble, which obviously the habs couldnt respond to. If they stuck to da plan, and white didn't look for trouble, there would have been nothing embarrassing about the series besides losing in 5.
Didn't watch the 3rd how JDLR looked?
I'm another one who's surprised at how well Gonchar's playing. In retrospect it makes sense. Habs play a less physical, more positional defensive game than most teams. That fits Gonchar's strengths - he knows where to be and isn't expected to crash into forwards.
Now let's start seeing some defensemen called up to give Gonchar a rest and give Tinordi, Pateryn or Nygren a look.
Dale is such a weird player. He'll show so much skill, then derpcity. The way he deked out most of the devils was amazing
Sens series went south after Eller got his face smashed in. Kreider had no fear of running Price because nobody on Habs to say boo to him. Notice there never was any retaliation.The **** are you talking about? That has nothing to do with size. The Habs could have easily done that to Lundqvist and there would have been no response by the rangers. Who is tougher than prust on their team? Terrible example.
Using the Rangers to prove a point on size is laughable. They had small players too like Zucs, St. Louis, Hagelin and soft defensemen like Staal and Stralman in their top 4.
They play a canadiens brand of hockey, but they just played it better than us. Kreider wouldn't have stopped running the goalie even if Chara was on the team. He does it all the time.
The Ottawa series went out of wack because White cheap shotted a guy and looked for trouble, which obviously the habs couldnt respond to. If they stuck to da plan, and white didn't look for trouble, there would have been nothing embarrassing about the series besides losing in 5.
I'm another one who's surprised at how well Gonchar's playing. In retrospect it makes sense. Habs play a less physical, more positional defensive game than most teams. That fits Gonchar's strengths - he knows where to be and isn't expected to crash into forwards.
Now let's start seeing some defensemen called up to give Gonchar a rest and give Tinordi, Pateryn or Nygren a look.
Why is it I have a feeling Gonchar will keep playing 20mins/game until the end of season, then get teared up during playoffs?
I'm another one who's surprised at how well Gonchar's playing. In retrospect it makes sense. Habs play a less physical, more positional defensive game than most teams. That fits Gonchar's strengths - he knows where to be and isn't expected to crash into forwards.
Now let's start seeing some defensemen called up to give Gonchar a rest and give Tinordi, Pateryn or Nygren a look.
there's no one to take his minutes, Gilbert needs to play less not more and Subban is already the ice time leader for the Habs.
Not in MTL, but it would be interesting to see how some of our RHD in Hamilton would fare in the NHL. I'd even try Tinordi on his off side, if this could work, it would solve many problems.