Not sure why everybody still clings to Petry as some kind of major loss. The guy just isn't very good - he gives the puck away far too much to be effective.
Maybe, compared to the other crap we have on D, he looked OK but, come on people - the best of crap is still crap. Petry sucks. If we are to have any hope, we need to get better D in here than Petry ever was.
That seems to somewhat mirror MacT's thought process as well, when he was giving Petry his "prove it" contract bringing him to UFA:
- the Oilers don't have a top pairing defenseman
- Petry is not good enough to be a top pairing defenseman
- therefore we should get rid of Petry
The problem here is pretty obvious: rather than solving the problem (lack of top pairing defensemen) it actually leaves you worse off than when you started (down a #3/4 guy).
The defense down the stretch was pretty much league-worst, which is not a surprising result when you:
a) get rid of one of your decent guys
b) know you have a couple of injury prone/aging guys in Nikitin/Ference,
and c) never bothered to fix the underlying issue in the first place
So you're right, we do need to get better D in here, but losing Petry for minimal return doesn't do that.
Worth noting that Montreal is succeeding with both Petry and Gilbert on their blueline. Yes, neither Petry nor Gilbert was ever the answer as a top pairing defenseman, but you're not going to fix that problem by just getting rid of them and then doing nothing.