Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Unless the 8th is attached that is far from realistic.
I have no idea what the other parts are.
It was Lebrun on ESPN.
Unless the 8th is attached that is far from realistic.
Per game, I donno. But Marner had the most primary points per game by a decent margin. No way did Tkachuk carry that line. Maybe I'll look in a bit, but no way do I have the time through every single game. But the fact their production didn't change much from switching linemates (and from watching most games live) I can say neither Dvorak or Marner were carried in any way. Considering Marner had a high ES ppg in the Regular season, a higher ES primary ppg in the regular season, ES ppg in the playoffs, and ES primary PPG in the playoffs, I don't know how anyone could make the argue Tkachuk carried that line. He filled his role and was very good at it, he's worthy of a top 5 picks, but don't make absurd statements off a Twitter quote you haven't even verified. All my numbers are from here.What were their ratios, though?
What really made me change my opinion on Tkachuk is that he scored a point in 67 of 73 of his team's even-strength goals with him on the ice(according to twitter). That's an absurd number and there's no way that could be down to luck and chance unless you'd bet on winning like 20 lottery jackpots in a row.
I thought that his linemates might have carried him, with this I feel like it actually was the other way around. That's a ridiculous number.
Craig Button over here comparing him to gronkowski
Craig Button over here comparing him to gronkowski
I'm not high on the guy. I saw him many times this year and wasn't overly impressed. Of the forwards in this class, I would take any of Matthews, Laine, Puljujarvi, Dubois, Nylander, Keller, or Jost over him (I know I'm in the minority, but that's just my opinion). It'll be interesting to see what he can do with the Knights next year, with Marner and Dvorak gone...I think his numbers will drop off substantially. In any case, we'll have to wait and see.
He's the smartest player in the draft. The next guys like Juolevi and Keller are wicked smart too, but the pace and precision with which Tkachuk makes reads and plays in the offensive zone are incredible.
Jim Benning said:The apple doesn't fall far from the tree...
...in front of the net, from the top of the circles down, he has unbelievable offensive instincts to make plays.
He's built like his dad, so he can stand in front of the net, tip pucks, deflect pucks, get rebounds - he scores a lot of goals in that tough area of the ice.
...from the first game of the year, all the way through the Memorial Cup and then scoring the OT winner... he was very impressive.
Tkachuk will be a sexy pick for either Edm, Van or Cgy
Tkachuk and Bennett on the same line... RIP.
I really see no way for Tkachuk to not go either 4. or 5. Then again, it's Benning so maybe he'll pick DeBrincat with the 5th pick or something.
Benning sucks at everything but drafting.
Oh, right. Then maybe he'll trade the 5th pick away for a shutdown defenseman or something, and add a 2nd round pick for good measure. Then again, the receiving team would just pick Tkachuk if available in that case...
And could still go 6.
What are you basing that on? Random. Friedman says the chances of that are "infinitesimal." Top five is set pretty much.
Well, Benning's choice is really easy. At least it fits the mould of drafting large men.
edit: kill me