Trade: [LV/GB] Davante Adams for 2022 1st and 2nd round picks

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,789
17,163
Mulberry Street
When your qb wants 50 mil a season these are the concessions that get made. Packers get a couple picks but they aren’t nearly as valuable as Adams is right now. For their own sake they better make a couple good picks or else this could look really bad.

Irrelevant. Adams wanted to play in LV. Had little to do with his contract.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
187,526
39,512
Raiders out is after 3 years with $7.7m of dead cap
 

SirClintonPortis

ProudCapitalsTraitor
Mar 9, 2011
18,577
4,456
Maryland native
Given that he already bought a house in Vegas a couple weeks before...this was no surprise internally to the Packers. Media kept their mouths shut(really easy to dox if they wanted to).
 

LightningStorm

Lightning/Mets/Vikings
Dec 19, 2008
3,120
2,123
Pacific NW, USA
Ever since the Love pick the Packers have gotten caught between the cracks of going all in on the present and building for the future.

They waste a R1 and R4 (by trading up) pick on Love in 2020 when they were in a contention window and when Rodgers's contract made it difficult to trade him the next 2 seasons. Rodgers had also stated his desire to play into his 40's, so the comparisons to when they drafted Rodgers during Favre annual offseason retirement speculation is a false equivalency. All this to say the timing of this pick was horribly botched.

Then Rodgers wins back to back MVP's and now they wanna keep him past Love's rookie deal. His recent contract was an all in move, yet having to trade Adams as a result limits how effective this all in move can be. Here they get really good draft capital to help their future, but by being forced to give up a prime superstar in Adams when going all in, they've been caught between the cracks again.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,789
17,163
Mulberry Street
Ever since the Love pick the Packers have gotten caught between the cracks of going all in on the present and building for the future.

They waste a R1 and R4 (by trading up) pick on Love in 2020 when they were in a contention window and when Rodgers's contract made it difficult to trade him the next 2 seasons. Rodgers had also stated his desire to play into his 40's, so the comparisons to when they drafted Rodgers during Favre annual offseason retirement speculation is a false equivalency. All this to say the timing of this pick was horribly botched.

Then Rodgers wins back to back MVP's and now they wanna keep him past Love's rookie deal. His recent contract was an all in move, yet having to trade Adams as a result limits how effective this all in move can be. Here they get really good draft capital to help their future, but by being forced to give up a prime superstar in Adams when going all in, they've been caught between the cracks again.

Thats not why Adams was traded. They could have fit him in with the cap. He wanted to play in LV.
 

LightningStorm

Lightning/Mets/Vikings
Dec 19, 2008
3,120
2,123
Pacific NW, USA
Thats not why Adams was traded. They could have fit him in with the cap. He wanted to play in LV.
Upon further review I stand corrected. Regardless of the reason Adams left, I'm still surprised Rodgers decided to return to GB when he knew Adams was gone before he signed the contract.
 

SirClintonPortis

ProudCapitalsTraitor
Mar 9, 2011
18,577
4,456
Maryland native
Upon further review I stand corrected. Regardless of the reason Adams left, I'm still surprised Rodgers decided to return to GB when he knew Adams was gone before he signed the contract.
NFC is a much easier conference on paper at the time. Brady had not unretired yet. Rams had to make changes and are not bringing their whole roster back.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad