Leafs nation, summed up in a two page thread.
That's true. It cannot be Clarkson either. He just doesn't display attention of detail in the defensive and neutral zone. However, when it comes to crashing the net and making himself available in the slot, he's a lot more effective than Kulemin. If we can merge the two, we'd be in a much better shape.The problem with the Kadri - Lupul line currently is that Raymond is forcing Lupul to play the RW. His RW struggles are well-documented, he needs to be on LW to be most effective.
Plus Raymond sucks so there's that. The 2nd line should have Lupul on the left and either Clarkson or Kulemin on the right.
That's true. It cannot be Clarkson either. He just doesn't display attention of detail in the defensive and neutral zone. However, when it comes to crashing the net and making himself available in the slot, he's a lot more effective than Kulemin. If we can merge the two, we'd be in a much better shape.
Personally, I think Kulemin is more ideal. Unfortunately he doesn't have the stick handling ability to slow the game down like Kadri. Those hands don't help either. Moreover, I don't think Lupul is that effective in that regard due to his average game across the boards and overall intensity. Someone like Ladd, however, could play Kadri's game and is just nasty to play against. Give Kadri someone like him and he'll start playing like a 7 footer.
Ladd - Kadri - Kulemin ( similar player)
I don't think Lupul fits in our team long-term. Instead, he would look a lot better with a calculative centre like Bolland. He is actually a very strong distributor and would look a lot better with skilled, defensively-strong, forwards with a good finish.
He's great, but Andrew Ladd would be much better with Kadri. I could see a very productive first line with Ladd and a physical glue guy (i.e Kulemin). I just don't see Kadri and Lupul meshing considering that the later cannot physically support Kadri. In other words, we need another JVR at the least.He's a PPG forward when he's healthy and playing well, at 5.2M that's one hell of a deal. Contracts like that will allow you to add more pieces to other places of need.
he's playing like garbage? The whole team is playing like garbage. Once Lupul has his mojo back he's always a great player.
He's great, but Andrew Ladd would be much better with Kadri. I could see a very productive first line with Ladd and a physical glue guy (i.e Kulemin). I just don't see Kadri and Lupul meshing considering that the later cannot physically support Kadri. In other words, we need another JVR at the least.
He's great, but Andrew Ladd would be much better with Kadri. I could see a very productive first line with Ladd and a physical glue guy (i.e Kulemin). I just don't see Kadri and Lupul meshing considering that the later cannot physically support Kadri. In other words, we need another JVR at the least.
He's great, but Andrew Ladd would be much better with Kadri. I could see a very productive first line with Ladd and a physical glue guy (i.e Kulemin). I just don't see Kadri and Lupul meshing considering that the later cannot physically support Kadri. In other words, we need another JVR at the least.
Clarkson doesn't play a strong game in all three zones to cover for Kadri and Lupul. Kulemin is much more productive in that regard. However, Kadri would be most productive around gritty forwards that can play his game. I think he would at least one, and neither Clarkson/ Kulemin represent that.That's why there are 3 players on a line. There are lots of players that could potentially mesh better, it's a big league. I think it all comes down to who that 3rd guy is and there hasn't really been a set wing tandem for a long period of time. Raymond frequents that pairing but other than flying down the wing and stopping he isn't doing a whole lot to help his linemates. Clarkson would be ideal but he hasn't really had time to get going with suspensions, injuries and Randy's preference to put him with blackhole Jay.
If they're tanking, we'll go for him. Ladd is a Carlyle forward, and he happens to be very skilled as well.Your only talking about the pegs Capitan and a player being mentioned as a Olympic possibility.
For some reason, I just don't think he can be had.
Exactly. You need that. Crosby isn't very exceptional defensively, but is surrounded by two-way guys in Dupuis and Kunitz. Likewise, Neal compliments Malkin well by being very strong two-way forward.I like Lupul but the problem with this team is that there aren't any way above average 2 way forwards on this team
Each forward on our team either excels offensively or defensively but never both
Clarkson doesn't play a strong game in all three zones to cover for Kadri and Lupul. Kulemin is much more productive in that regard. However, Kadri would be most productive around gritty forwards that can play his game. I think he would at least one, and neither Clarkson/ Kulemin represent that.
If they're tanking, we'll go for him. Ladd is a Carlyle forward, and he happens to be very skilled as well.
I like Lupul but the problem with this team is that there aren't any way above average 2 way forwards on this team
Each forward on our team either excels offensively or defensively but never both
Those are the kind of players that teams lock up long term.
You pretty much have to draft and develop those.
Those are the kind of players that teams lock up long term.
You pretty much have to draft and develop those.
Clarkson doesn't play a strong game in all three zones to cover for Kadri and Lupul. Kulemin is much more productive in that regard. However, Kadri would be most productive around gritty forwards that can play his game. I think he would at least one, and neither Clarkson/ Kulemin represent that.
If they're tanking, we'll go for him. Ladd is a Carlyle forward, and he happens to be very skilled as well.
That says a lot about our organizations value of draft picks, development and drafting abilities
Teams aren't going to hand you those players unless you are willing to give them a fortune. I would give them a fortune although Im probably in the minority
We're not as bad in the middle as most think. Bozak is a pretty effective second liner, while Kadri can be our point producer and Bolland is an excellent two-way guy.price wouldnt be cheap, wing isnt exactly our top need(Top 4 d, then two-way centre, then winger) but a two-way winger would definitely be very helpful.