Proposal: Lupul + Gardiner for Pavelski + Demers

Discussion in 'San Jose Sharks' started by CanadianSharks, Oct 22, 2013.

View Users: View Users
  1. CanadianSharks

    CanadianSharks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    28,714
    Likes Received:
    1,102
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Simply put, what are your thoughts on this proposal? I was discussing it with some Leafs fans and it could be decent. It'd be cap neutral, or we might even gain a little space. Gardiner is an upgrade on Demers now and future. Lupul could be a good winger with any of our centres. Basically we get a little more top heavy, but I still like our depth, and get our future PP QB and potential top pairing d-man.
     
  2. JayP812

    JayP812 The Team of Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    6,485
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Bay Area
    Pavs just signed long-term.
     
  3. Gene Parmesan

    Gene Parmesan Dedicated to babies who came feet first

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    82,848
    Likes Received:
    2,055
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    California
    Pavelski is way too important to this team right now. Lupul is a good player but hes injury prone.
     
  4. Jake Gardiner moves like Dan Boyle in his prime. I'd love to add him, but Lupul's injury history might deter me from trading for him when he's signed through 2018. We don't need another broken right winger on the roster (he's been fantastic when healthy, though).
     
  5. SJeasy

    SJeasy Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    12,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    disabled
    Location:
    San Jose
    In the immortal words of Nancy Reagan, "Just say NO".:laugh:
     
  6. Grave

    Grave Mondo Cool

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    13,750
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    87
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Arbiter of Entropy
    Location:
    Northern California
    Gardiner for Hamilton + Demers & 1st round pick in 2014
     
  7. Gene Parmesan

    Gene Parmesan Dedicated to babies who came feet first

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    82,848
    Likes Received:
    2,055
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    California
    Exactly. :laugh:
     
  8. Leidi J

    Leidi J Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Gardiner may end up being awesome and if he fulfills his potential the value here MIGHT be fair. But that's all it is right now, potential. And it doesn't help that his team basically seems to be trying to get rid of him. If a young player is really all that and a bag of chips constant trade rumors and that stuff doesn't happen. Anyways, Pavelski is proven and could be the #1 C on several teams including the Leafs. Not a chance DW would or should consider this.
     
  9. Hatrick Marleau

    Hatrick Marleau Just Win The Game

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    4,470
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    With JR
    If you can count on Joffrey Lupul to stay healthy the whole year I'd consider it but Pavs is just a super important player.
     
  10. Fistfullofbeer

    Fistfullofbeer 65 + 88 Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    17,509
    Likes Received:
    709
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Solutions Architect
    Location:
    Whidbey Island, WA
    While driving from work today I was listening to NHL on Sirius and they were talking about Yakupov possibly being setup for a trade.

    I would never dare to make a trade proposal on the Trade boards but I am curious what people though about a trade centering Pavs and Yakupov. The reason I thought about Pavs (from our side) is because he is exactly what the Oilers need: a really good 1B/2A two-way center who is under 30 and signed a good long term contract.

    I am just wondering about this from a value perspective. We DO NOT have any need for Yakupov and Pavs is way too important for us to have 3 scoring lines.

    It would still probably be Pavs+ for Yakupov right?

    What do you guys think?
     
  11. Gene Parmesan

    Gene Parmesan Dedicated to babies who came feet first

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    82,848
    Likes Received:
    2,055
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    California
    Not enough according to Oiler fans. Anything short of Shea Weber is a lowball offer.
     
  12. Leidi J

    Leidi J Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    I wouldn't want Yakupov unless we got him for a big discount. I don't like the effort questions or the seeming resistance to taking coaching and unwillingness to change his game. We've seen how much better this team is when everyone buys into the system especially defensively and I wouldn't want that kind of "problem child" so to speak. At least, as I said, not at market price. If we were getting some kind of steal, like a large package of prospects/draft picks/role player types, sure. But Pavs could score 30 goals again this year while playing amazing defense and PKing. Do people really think Yakupov would contribute that much more? Especially immediately, with us trying to win the cup right now? I wouldn't bet on it.
     
  13. hockeyball

    hockeyball Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    21,054
    Likes Received:
    254
    Trophy Points:
    154
    If they want rid of him this quickly I want nothing to do with him.
     
  14. SJeasy

    SJeasy Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    12,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    disabled
    Location:
    San Jose
    I wish all of you would cut the Pavs for a winger stuff. Pavs eats 20min or more a night some of it hard minutes on PK. He is a top 20 forward PKer. He produces at the high end of second line centers on the scoresheet. Find another guy who has as proven a track record in the playoffs. Pavs carried the team for 2 series which is no mean feat. And Pavs does not have a dropoff from reg season in playoff scoring (an attribute that is rare as hen's teeth). That brings his trade value to that of a #1 center or #1 dman in his prime. Whoever you propose better be stellar on PK and stellar on playoff scoring and proven. Yakupov, Gardiner and Lupul aren't even in the ballpark.

    We have gone over the proofs on the Sharks issues in the playoffs when they fail, lack of scoring. Yet, you (plural) propose that we unload the one guy who is stellar in that regard. What are you thinking?
     
  15. Fistfullofbeer

    Fistfullofbeer 65 + 88 Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    17,509
    Likes Received:
    709
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Solutions Architect
    Location:
    Whidbey Island, WA
    From what I heard on radio, it is more of a fit thing. They have been playing him on the 3rd line with players that do not compliment his skill-set at all. He is essentially a spare part right now. Plus the Oilers are stacked on Wingers. They need good Centers, defensemen and a goalie.
     
  16. Bizz

    Bizz 120% Banter

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,016
    Likes Received:
    1,107
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    San Jose
    Lupul sucks and Gardiner is a bust. Pass.
     
  17. Fistfullofbeer

    Fistfullofbeer 65 + 88 Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    17,509
    Likes Received:
    709
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Solutions Architect
    Location:
    Whidbey Island, WA
    I hope that was not addressed to me.

    If you look at my post I was asking this purely from a value perspective. I mentioned in the post itself that Pavs is much more valuable to us to keep our 3 scoring lines going and that Yakupov is not really needed for our team.

    I am more interested in this to understand trade value. Is this a bad value, good value, etc. And what pieces would be required to actually make the trade. Again .. I am not advocating the trade. Just trying to gauge perceived value of players.
     
  18. SJeasy

    SJeasy Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    12,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    disabled
    Location:
    San Jose
    I wasn't sure on your meaning, but the "you" was addressed to several on this board who keep hopping on the trade Pavs bandwagon. You apparently are with the "in" crowd on 3rd line scoring being essential for playoff success. A successful third line is very, very hard to achieve and should not be thrown away lightly.

    I tried to give the value. Guys like Suter, Weber, Pietrangelo. Guys like Kopitar. In terms of wings, a younger Alfie, a younger Hossa, etc. That is rarified air. If you wanted a near equate for Pavs, Bergeron, which would be a very sideways trade. Bergeron has marginally better value for defense and skating speed.

    Additionally, I forgot one other positive Pavs attribute. He has been used in a shutdown center role successfully. Again, rarified air.
     
  19. do0glas

    do0glas Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    12,617
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Pavs is basically pulling a Thornton on that third line.

    A rookie and a winger with like 80 nhl games and he has them producing. I can't wait to look at underlying stats after about 40 games to see how he's affecting goal scoring for his line mates.

    Defensively it's the same. Is his line sheltered really? I need to look.
     
  20. Juxtaposer

    Juxtaposer Outro: Divina Comedia

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    41,646
    Likes Received:
    2,293
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Bay Area
    God no. Lupul is the worst defensive forward in the league in my opinion. I would love to acquire Gardiner for Demers + or something but there is no way in hell I move Pavs.
     
  21. SJeasy

    SJeasy Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    12,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    disabled
    Location:
    San Jose
    Right now, Pavs line is sheltered. When Hertl went on his tear, the opposition threw their top d against JT. We have to wait and see how long that lasts and what TM does over the next stretch of home games when TM has the matchup advantage.
     
  22. Gene Parmesan

    Gene Parmesan Dedicated to babies who came feet first

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    82,848
    Likes Received:
    2,055
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    California
    Plus Lupul is about as durable as Havlat.
     
  23. Amadeus

    Amadeus Stand Witness

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    227
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Toronto
    Blashphemy.

    As far as the deal is concerend, I'll reluctantly say yes. I'm a huge Pavelski fan, and feel that adding his two-way element will really improve us.

    I'd actually cream my pants seeing a potential Team USA line of JVR - Pavs - Kessel on my Leafs.

    Gardiner oozes potential and is a surefire future top 4 D-man capable of QB'ing a PP. Lupul has been rejuvenated in Toronto and is one of our most important players. His defensive play is way overblown. Toronto is a pretty nitpicking city when it comes to players. Trust me, we'll notice when someone is horrible at D.
     
  24. MegalodonManiac

    MegalodonManiac U'llneedabiggerboat

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Making Waves
    Location:
    Scotts Valley, CA
    All such suggestions seem to fit into the category of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". The Sharks have a good room, a great mix of sage veterans and youthful exuberance and good leadership (was nice to see the "A" on Couture the other day) on and off the ice, so to make significant chances would be foolhardy at best. If the wheels fall off mid-season, it might make sense for DW to go shopping, but as of now, its hard to imagine any deal that would make us significantly better in our top 9/4 that wouldn't also likely cause at least as many problems as it would be intended to solve.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"