Hmm...
So... lemme guess.. you were opposed to the Torts firing because you felt that Torts was an excellent coach and even better people manager?
And you supported his decision tospit in our franchise goalie's eye,cause a goalie controversy where there was none,start Eddie Lack because Eddie gave us the best chance to win at the Winter Classic.
Regardless of what the people of Vancouver wanted and regardless of the clustereff of Gillis/Luo/Schneid a couple years back.
Right?
1) Luongo asked for a trade well before the winter classic. A year before.
2) Torts...I figured he'd be given the start of the next season depending on post-season interview with the players but didn't care either way. Was more surprised Gillis was fired as I figured he deserved to stay and execute the game plan he was clearly moving to (and which Benning and Linden share).
3) Lack was the correct choice to start the game he was playing better and they needed points. Pride be damned. Suck it up. He asked to be traded but wants to be the face for the BC place game? Give me a break. Doesn't work that way. It was also the second time Luongo was being outplayed by his backup. And yes that is completely different than (allegedly) screwing a guy out of millions of dollars. It's not even in the same ballpark.
But none of that has anything to do with anything.
Luongo wasn't happy in Vancouver and that started well before the Winter Classic. He wanted to be traded before the winter classic. He wanted to be traded before the lockout and certainly during that season. He asked for that trade and eventually got it. But if I were in the crowd I wouldn't be applauding him. In the end while the best goaltender the franchise has seen the accolades he brought to the team are few.
Doesn't mean I would boo him (I don't tend to do that either) but I'm not going out of my way to pat the guy on the back.