opendoor
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 11,719
- 1,403
Goaltending was not an issue in those first 2 games and to abandon your starter like that after being a year removed from 2 Stanley Cup Final shutouts is a joke.
It was handled poorly. That decision goes against all logic. Crazy that a team would toss aside a guy like that.
Well that's really just a matter of opinion. A lot more went on in that SCF than just a couple of shutouts and Luongo didn't look great in those first couple of games vs LA, giving up 7 GA in 2 games. Given that he had a backup who'd been absolutely lights out all year, it seemed like a logical move to me.
But really, my issue was more with this:
How Vancouver handled the goaltending situation in that Los Angeles series was a joke. Pathetic. Vancouver may walk away with that series if they stick with Luongo and not a cold Schneider. Just ridiculous.
Schneider was the Canucks' best player in games 3-5. What exactly was Luongo going to do that Schneider didn't that would get the Canucks past the Kings?